Cognition, Context, and Theory Building

Abstract

English studies are caught up in a debate over whether we should see individual cognition or social and cultural context as the motive force in literate acts. This conflict between cognition and context (Bartholomae, Berlin, Bizzell, Knoblauch) has special force in rhetoric and composition because it touches some deeply-rooted assumptions and practices. Can we, for instance, reconcile a commitment to nurturing a personal voice, individual purpose, or an inner, self-directed process of meaning making, with rhetoric's traditional assumption that both inquiry and purpose are a response to rhetorical situations, or with the more recent assertions that inquiry in writing must start with social, cultural, or political awareness? These values and assertions run deep in the discipline. One response to these differences is to build theoretical positions that try to polarize (or moralize) cognitive and contextual perspectives. We know that critiques based on dichotomies can fan lively academic debates. They can also lead, Mike Rose has argued, to reductive, simplified theories that narrow the mind and page of student writers. In the end, these attempts to dichotomize may leave us with an impoverished account of the writing process as people experience it and a reductive vision of what we might teach.

Journal
College Composition and Communication
Published
1989-10-01
DOI
10.2307/357775
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (27)

  1. Research in the Teaching of English
  2. College Composition and Communication
  3. College Composition and Communication
  4. Technical Communication Quarterly
  5. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Show all 27 →
  1. Written Communication
  2. Rhetoric Review
  3. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  4. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  5. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  6. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  7. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  8. Written Communication
  9. Technical Communication Quarterly
  10. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  11. Written Communication
  12. Technical Communication Quarterly
  13. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  14. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  15. Computers and Composition
  16. Written Communication
  17. Written Communication
  18. Technical Communication Quarterly
  19. Rhetoric Review
  20. Written Communication
  21. Written Communication
  22. Rhetoric Review

References (0)

No references on file for this article.