Abstract

Bronislaw Malinowski introduces influential ideas of context to rhetoric when he rejects texts and etymology to argue that meaning is determined by tangible, embodied circumstances. I turn to ancient texts and Kenneth Burke's reading of Malinowski to argue that we order—and are ordered by—rhetorical contexts that are composed of hierarchical designs, oppositional ideas, and material bodies.

Journal
Rhetoric Review
Published
2005-04-01
DOI
10.1207/s15327981rr2402_3
Open Access
Closed

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (3)

  1. Rhetoric Review
  2. Rhetoric Review
  3. College Composition and Communication
Also cites 12 works outside this index ↓
  1. Burke, Kenneth. Language as Symbolic Action: Essays on Life, Literature, and Method. Berkeley: U of Californi…
  2. Burke, Kenneth. Rhetoric of Religion: Studies in Logology. Berkeley: U of California P, 1970.
  3. 10.1215/0961754X-8-1-152
    Common Knowledge 8.1 (  
  4. Carlyle, Thomas. Sartor Resartus. Berkeley: U of California P, 2000.
  5. Cicero. De Oratore, De Fato and De Partitione Oratoria. Trans. H. Rackham. Vol. 2. London: Heinemann, 1942. 2 vols.
  6. 10.2307/358391
    College Composition and Communication 44.4 (  
  7. Fish, Stanley. Doing What Comes Naturally: Change, Rhetoric, and the Practice of Theory in Literary and Legal…
  8. Hill, Geoffrey. The Enemy's Country: Words, Contexture, and Other Circumstances of Language. Palo Alto: Stanf…
  9. 10.1080/10417948709372696
    The Southern Speech Communication Journal  
  10. Lentricchia, Frank. Criticism and Social Change. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1984.
  11. 10.2307/357468
    College Composition and Communication 39.3 (  
  12. Wess, Robert. Kenneth Burke: Rhetoric, Subjectivity, Postmodernism. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1996.
CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network →