Abstract

In a recent Festschrift for Edward P. J. Corbett, Andrea A. Lunsford and Lisa S. Ede look dispassionately at the issues we now concern ourselves with in historical rhetoric, evaluate them, and conclude forcefully that much of Aristotle's work has been reduced to the unrecognizable.I They assert that much of the secondary work in Aristotle depends on misunderstandings that can occur when commentators ignore the fundamental connections among Aristotle's writings (41). Later in the same essay, in citing William Grimaldi's complex interconnections among Aristotle's works, Lunsford and Ede say, rational man of Aristotle's rhetoric is not a automaton, but a languageusing animal who unites reason and emotion in discourse with others. Aristotle (and indeed, Plato and Isocrates as well) studied the power of the mind to gain meaning from the world and to share that meaning with others (43). The Aristotle as logic-chopping that Lunsford and Ede have named for us represents the inadequate and sometimes even wrong interpretation that a significant number of rhetorical scholars rely on in their presentations of classical rhetoric. The explication of Aristotle as automaton also provides us with a critique of the state of some scholarly work on classical rhetoric in American rhetoric and composition during the last twenty years. This formulaic view of rhetoric, which emerges eventually as a pattern, relies on reducing the intertwining theories that make up classical rhetoric and replacing them with simple categories. This kind of reductivism, a version of classical rhetoric that writers of the Heritage School (Welch 120) often use, hinders complex interpretation, such as the work of Walter Ong and James Kinneavy, and deprives classical rhetoric of its strength and its attractiveness. The Heritage School presentation of classical rhetoric primarily as a series of rules, dicta, and

Journal
Rhetoric Review
Published
1987-09-01
DOI
10.1080/07350198709359154
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (3)

  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  2. Rhetoric Review
  3. Rhetoric Review

References (36) · 1 in this index

  1. After Babel: Aspects of Language and Translation
  2. Tradition and Reform in the Teaching of English: A History
  3. The Rhetoric of Aristotle
  4. The “Art” of Rhetoric
  5. Brutus; or, Remarks on Eminent Orators. Cicero on Oratory and Orators
Show all 36 →
  1. De Oratore; or on the Character of the Orator. Cicero on Oratory and Orators
  2. Syntactic Structures
  3. Essays on Classical Rhetoric and Modern Discourse
  4. Literary Theory: An Introduction
  5. Philosophy and Rhetoric
  6. Contemporary Rhetoric
  7. The Present State of Scholarship in Historical and Contemporary Rhetoric
  8. The Bedford Bibliography.
  9. Studies in the Philosophy of Aristotle's Rhetoric
  10. The Greek Philosophers From Thaïes to Aristotle
  11. The Sophists
  12. The Present State of Scholarship in Historical and Contemporary Rhetoric
  13. Reading Latin Poetry
  14. The Political Unconscious
  15. The Art of Persuasion in Greece
  16. A Theory of Discourse
  17. Rhetorical Traditions and the Teaching of Writing
  18. Essays on Classical Rhetoric and Modern Discourse
  19. Difference in Translation
  20. Introduction to Aristotle
  21. Rhetoric and Praxis. The Contribution of Classical Rhetoric to Practical Reasoning
  22. The Rhetorical Tradition and Modern Writing
  23. 10.4324/9780203328064
  24. Phaedrus
  25. Criticism: The Major Statements
  26. After Babel: Aspects of Language and Translation
  27. On Difficulty and Other Essays
  28. Critical Theory Since Plato
  29. 10.1037/11193-000
  30. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  31. Oldspeak/ Newspeak: Rhetorical Transformations