Abstract

This article examines the rhetoric employed by the Atomic Energy Commission and its successor, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, to communicate the risks of nuclear power to legislators and the public. Close reading of official and unofficial documents demonstrates the importance of developing an effective risk-communication strategy in anticipation of danger rather than in response.

Journal
Technical Communication Quarterly
Published
2015-10-02
DOI
10.1080/10572252.2015.1079334
Open Access
Closed

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication

Cites in this index (5)

  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  4. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  5. Technical Communication Quarterly
Also cites 6 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.2307/3106954
  2. 10.2307/1287656
  3. 10.1126/science.299.5609.1001
  4. 10.1111/0272-4332.211101
  5. 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1999.tb00439.x
  6. 10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00433.x
CrossRef global citation count: 7 View in citation network →