Abstract

Apocalypticism is a powerful brew of eschatological belief and political imagination that is extremely persuasive. This article addresses the intersections between apocalyptic rhetoric and the technical communication of risk, disease outbreak, and disaster preparedness by analyzing the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s zombie apocalypse preparedness campaign. Specifically, I argue that the framing of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s campaign relies on and extends problematic iterations of apocalypticism and undermines the educational objectives of disaster preparedness and response. I conclude with suggestions for how technical communicators designing public awareness and outreach campaigns can use existential risk rhetoric for engagement without succumbing to the pernicious side effects of apocalypticism.

Journal
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published
2020-10-01
DOI
10.1177/0047281619892630
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (3)

  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Journal of Business and Technical Communication

Cites in this index (12)

  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  4. Technical Communication Quarterly
  5. Technical Communication Quarterly
Show all 12 →
  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  5. Technical Communication Quarterly
  6. Technical Communication Quarterly
  7. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Also cites 7 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.2307/j.ctt5hjng7
  2. 10.1111/j.1527-2001.1996.tb01033.x
  3. 10.1080/00909882.2015.1019544
  4. 10.1215/0041462X-2000-1003
  5. 10.2307/378062
  6. 10.1023/A:1007704101604
  7. Millennial seduction: A skeptic confronts apocalyptic culture
CrossRef global citation count: 5 View in citation network →