Abstract

In this article we compare two different perspectives on the National Science Foundation (NSF) grant proposal and funding process: that depicted by the genre-dominant NSF Web site and that articulated by several successful NSF-funded researchers. Using genre theory and play theory to map the respective processes, we found that a systems-based refocusing of audience analysis—namely, genre field analysis—allows researchers a more accurate understanding of their roles as agents within the system.

Journal
Technical Communication Quarterly
Published
2009-12-29
DOI
10.1080/10572250903373098
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (4)

  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. Computers and Composition

References (16) · 2 in this index

  1. Genre and the new rhetoric
  2. International Conference on Computer Documentation
  3. Cyber–Marx: Cycles and circuits of struggle in high–technology capitalism.
  4. Technical Communication Quarterly
  5. How we became posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics.
Show all 16 →
  1. Homo ludens: A study of the play element in culture.
  2. We have never been modern
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. Game work: Language, power, and computer game culture.
  5. 10.1080/00335638409383686
  6. National Science Foundation [NSF]. October 14 2008. October 14, Retrieved October 15, 2008, fromhttp://nsf.go…
  7. International Conference on Computer Documentation
  8. International Conference on Computer Documentation
  9. 10.1145/344599.344646
  10. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Documentation
  11. 10.1177/002194360203900102