Abstract

Scientist-writers Rachel Carson and Loren Eiseley use a variety of narrative strategies to describe natural phenomena and explain scientific concepts. These techniques also contribute to an incisive yet balanced critique of science, one rooted in an ethical approach to nature, a rejection of anthropocentrism, and a healthy suspicion of the blind faith in scientific and technological progress. This article analyzes their use of metaphor and perspective, construction of narrative personae, emotional appeals, and invocations of the imagination.

Journal
Technical Communication Quarterly
Published
2003-10-01
DOI
10.1207/s15427625tcq1204_2
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (6)

  1. College English
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  3. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  4. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  5. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Show all 6 →
  1. Technical Communication Quarterly

References (6)

  1. Angyal, Andrew. Loren Eiseley. Boston: Twayne, 1983.
  2. Brooks, Paul. The House of Life: Rachel Carson at Work. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin, 1972.
  3. - Speaking for Nature: How Literary Naturalists from Henry Thoreau to Rachel Carson Have Shaped America. Bost…
  4. Buell, Lawrence. The Environmental Imagination: Thmeau, Nature Writing, and the Formation of American Culture…
  5. Carson, Rachel: The Edge of the Sea. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1955.
Show all 6 →
  1. - Lost Woods: The Discovered Writings of Rachel Carson. Ed. and intro. by Linda Lear. Boston: Beacon, 1998.