Abstract

For small and mid‐sized universities, the 200‐level technical writing service course often represents the primary writing experience for students after their freshman year. Our “service” should help students develop the tools for analyzing language and understanding writing in complex ways. Assignment sequences should engage students in active research to develop four primary literacies: rhetorical, visual, information, and computer. This article focuses on disciplinarity and underlying pedagogical goals in technical writing classrooms by describing a search engine assignment sequence which promotes literate practices in three short reports: 1) A preview/instructions report, 2) An analysis/ evaluation report, and 3) A narrative review of a research activity. This article concludes with implications for these types of classroom practices.

Journal
Technical Communication Quarterly
Published
1999-06-01
DOI
10.1080/10572259909364669
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication

Cites in this index (3)

  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Research in the Teaching of English
Also cites 2 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.2307/377477
  2. Reflection in the Writing Classroom.
CrossRef global citation count: 10 View in citation network →