Abstract

For small and mid‐sized universities, the 200‐level technical writing service course often represents the primary writing experience for students after their freshman year. Our “service” should help students develop the tools for analyzing language and understanding writing in complex ways. Assignment sequences should engage students in active research to develop four primary literacies: rhetorical, visual, information, and computer. This article focuses on disciplinarity and underlying pedagogical goals in technical writing classrooms by describing a search engine assignment sequence which promotes literate practices in three short reports: 1) A preview/instructions report, 2) An analysis/ evaluation report, and 3) A narrative review of a research activity. This article concludes with implications for these types of classroom practices.

Journal
Technical Communication Quarterly
Published
1999-06-01
DOI
10.1080/10572259909364669
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (3)

  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  3. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication

References (11) · 3 in this index

  1. 10.2307/377477
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Programs that Work: Models and Methods for Writing across the Curriculum.
  4. Technical Communication Quarterly
  5. E‐Literacies: Politexts, Hypertexts, and Other Cultural Formations in the Late Age of Print.
Show all 11 →
  1. Writing in the Arts and Sciences.
  2. Research in the Teaching of English
  3. Technical Communication
  4. Evolving Perspectives on Computers and Composition: Questions for the 1990s.
  5. Writing in the Academic Disciplines, 1870–1990: A Curricular History.
  6. Reflection in the Writing Classroom.