Dangerous Reciprocity: Creating a Madness Narrative Research Methodology

Cynthia Fields

doi:10.59236/rjv14i1pp40-57

Reflections: A Journal of Community-Engaged Writing and Rhetoric Sep 2014 Open Access

Dangerous Reciprocity: Creating a Madness Narrative Research Methodology

Cynthia Fields

Abstract

In this article I examine the nature of reciprocity and representation when mental illness is associated with the researcher and/or participant. Reciprocity has been a central concept of activist research methodology, which explores how academic knowledge can be used in the public sphere. Ellen Cushman defines reciprocity as “an open and conscious negotiation of the power structures reproduced during the give-and-take interactions of the people involved on both sides of the relationship” (16). Reciprocity can take the form of sharing the final write-up with participants, inviting participants into the composing of the write-up itself, and writing for and with participants on community-rather than academically-focused projects. These facets of reciprocity are particularly attuned to the civic turn of rhetoric and composition, such as that seen in John Ackerman’s and David Coogan’s edited collection, The Public Work of Rhetoric. For example, in Sophists for Social Change, Coogan describes his experience partnering with teens to organize a booklet describing a city community in order to promote a teen center. The civically-oriented, activist nature of reciprocity links it to the public sphere through its concern for research participants.

Journal: Reflections: A Journal of Community-Engaged Writing and Rhetoric
Published: 2014-09-01
DOI: 10.59236/rjv14i1pp40-57
CompPile: Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access: OA PDF Gold
Topics: rhetorical criticism public rhetoric
Export: BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (10) · 2 in this index

(2010)

The Public Work of Rhetoric: Citizen-Scholars and Civic Engagement
Coogan (2010)

Sophists for Social Change
Cushman (1996)

The Rhetorician as an Agent of Social Change

College Composition and Communication
Fisher (2014)

Methodology and Mental Illness: Resistance and Restorying

Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Nursing
Kirsch (2005)

Friendship, Friendliness, and Feminist Fieldwork

Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society ↗

Show all 10 →

Newkirk

Seduction and Betrayal in Qualitative Research
Peter Mortensen and Gesa Kirsch. Urbana: National Council of Teachers of English, 1996. 3-16. Print.
Powell et al. (2003)

Accepting Roles Created for Us: The Ethics of Reciprocity

College Composition and Communication
Price (2009)

Her Pronouns Wax and Wane': Psychological Disability, Autobiography, and Counter-Diagnosis

Journal of Literary and Cultural Disability Studies ↗
Radden (2012)

Recognition Rights, Mental Health Consumers and Reconstructive Cultural Semantics

Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine ↗

CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Dangerous Reciprocity: Creating a Madness Narrative Research Methodology

Abstract

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

References (10) · 2 in this index

Related Articles