Portal and Gatekeeper: How Peer Feedback Functions in a High School Writing Class

Valerie L. Marsh University of Rochester

Abstract

To counter inequitable, hierarchical classroom structures, research in the fields of language and literacy studies often looks to the affordances of online spaces, such as affinity spaces, for learning that is collaborative and knowledge that is distributed; yet, researchers continue to locate theirstudies in virtual spaces, outside classroom walls. This study, situated in a high school writing class, repositions the familiar classroom practice of peer feedback as a way to access affinity space features. Using qualitative case study design and grounded theory analysis, the study reveals that,when supported by an emphasis on social connection, the practice of peer feedback served as a portal for students with a range of writing experience and interest to collaborate and exchange honest feedback, practices indicative of affinity space features. Yet, traditional expectations preserved teacher roles and student roles in ways that prevented the class from more fully accessing the affinity space features of distributed expertise, porous leadership, and role flexibility. Discussion expands the field’s understanding of affinity spaces and their application in physical classrooms by outlining new features, theorizing these classroom spaces, and advocating for a reimagine dvision of peer feedback in ELA classrooms where role reciprocity and flexibility resist traditional,inequitable classroom structures.

Journal
Research in the Teaching of English
Published
2018-11-15
DOI
10.58680/rte201829865
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. College Composition and Communication

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 22 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1598/JAAL.52.1.2
  2. What is wrong with social theory?
    American Sociological Review  
  3. Tending to Change: Toward a Situated Model of Affinity Spaces
    E-Learning and Digital Media  
  4. Why so many structural changes in schools and so little reform inteaching practice?
    Journal of Educational administration  
  5. Writing in the wild: Writers’ motivation in fan-based affinity spaces
    Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy  
  6. Writing ethnographic fieldnotes
  7. Women and gaming
  8. 10.4324/9780203830918
    Languageand learning in the digital age  
  9. Peer versus expert feedback: Aninvestigation of the quality of peer feedback among second…
    Computers & Education  
  10. Democratizing classroom discourse: Thechallenge for online writing environments
    E-Learning and Digital Media  
  11. Fangirls as teachers: Examining pedagogic discourse in an online fan site
    Learning, media and technology  
  12. Going public: An adolescent’s networked writing on Fan Fiction.net
    Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy  
  13. Denaturalizing adolescence: The politics of contemporary representations
    Youth & Society  
  14. Words on the screen: Broadening analyses of interactions among fan fiction writers and re…
    Literacy  
  15. Reading attitudes of middle school students: Results of a U.S. survey
    Reading Research Quarterly  
  16. New Literacies and the institution of old learning
    ReadingResearch Quarterly  
  17. A figment of their imagination
    Journal of Ado-lescent & Adult Literacy  
  18. The impact of a rubric and friendship on peer assessment: Effects on construct validity, …
    Studies in Educational Evaluation  
  19. The reliability and validity of peer review of writing in high school AP English classes
    Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy  
  20. Awesome, dude! Responding helpfully to peer writing
    English Journal  
  21. Expertise and the teacher as expert: Rethinking a questionable metaphor
    American Educational Research Journal  
  22. Cloud-based collaborative writing and the Common Core standards
    Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy  
CrossRef global citation count: 7 View in citation network →