Research in the Teaching of English
Dec 1994
Responses to Our Critics
Elliot W. Eisner
Stanford University
;
David J. Flinders
Indiana University
Abstract
The task of responding to five serious and thoughtful papers is not an easy one. Although there is some overlap among them, each paper makes its own distinctive points. What we have decided to do is to identify the major concerns expressed by each author and then to respond to those concerns as best we can. The level of specificity that is possible in the identification of concerns is virtually infinite. The concerns that we have identified we regard as either important in their own right or common across the five papers that were invited. Following each point is our response.
- Journal
- Research in the Teaching of English
- Published
- 1994-12-01
- DOI
- 10.58680/rte199415368
- CompPile
- Search in CompPile ↗
- Open Access
- Closed
- Topics
- Export
- BibTeX RIS
Citation Context
Cited by in this index (0)
No articles in this index cite this work.
References (0)
No references on file for this article.
Related Articles
-
Written Communication May 2026Categorizing Human Identity in Writing Research: A Case for Participant Self-Identification in the Disaggregation of Data ↗Jennifer Burke Reifman
-
Res Rhetorica Apr 2026The rhetorical dimension of the justification for the absence of direct military support for Ukraine in Joe Biden’s statements ↗Marta Kobylska
-
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication Mar 2026Miriam F. Williams
-
Computers and Composition Mar 2026Morgan Banville; Leah Heilig; Madison Jones
-
Computers and Composition Mar 2026Shifting rhetorical agency in multimodal UX composition with AI: Sharing rhetorical authority with technologies ↗Nupoor Ranade; Daniel L. Hocutt