Commentary: Reflections on Field Research and Professional Practice

Carl G. Herndl Iowa State University ; Greg Wilson Los Alamos National Laboratory

Abstract

Borrowing from the ethnographic genre that Van Maanen (1988) called the confessional tale, this commentary reflects on the political, ethical, and professional concerns that arise when critical intellectuals work in a government installation that maintains the nation’s nuclear stockpile. The authors suggest that the future is, as Haraway (1997) argued, ineluctably technological and that the best way to engage this cultural formation is from within, eschewing the easy politics of the science wars and articulating critical projects with the hard work of science. The modernist ideal of unconflicted ideological positions and research—stories of good guys and bad guys—is a disabling illusion. Practicing rhetoricians face a kind of “worldliness” that Hall (1989) described as a necessary counterpart to the “clean air” of theory. The authors invite their colleagues to join them in grappling with political and ethical analyses in a world of impure identity in which knowledge and power circulate promiscuously.

Journal
Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Published
2007-04-01
DOI
10.1177/1050651906297171
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (9)

  1. Decentering the center: Philosophy for a multicultural, postcolonial, and feminist world
  2. Philosophy and Rhetoric
  3. We gotta get out of this place: Popular conservatism and postmodern culture
  4. Cultural Studies
  5. Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium.FemaleMan©_Meets_OncoMouse™: Feminism and technoscience
Show all 9 →
  1. Pandora’s hope: Essays on the reality of science studies
  2. Hegemony and socialist strategy: Toward a radical democratic politics
  3. Defining science: A rhetoric of demarcation
  4. Tales of the field: On writing ethnography