Emotional Appeals and Moral Standards: Rhetorical Arguments in Court Cases

Journal of Technical Writing and Communication Jul 2019

Emotional Appeals and Moral Standards: Rhetorical Arguments in Court Cases

Mary L. Schuster

Abstract

In this article, I analyze 73 circuit court opinions in which due process rights are weighed according to a little-known legal test called shocks the conscience. I also offer my observations of a federal trial in the U.S. district court in 2015 upon which the test was imposed. I reveal how requiring the shocks-the-conscience test confirms the authority of the state and silences those who have been singled out as individuals or as groups to be deprived of constitutional rights. In particular, professional communication scholars who examine emotional appeals as rhetorical strategies should find this article of interest.

Journal: Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published: 2019-07-01
DOI: 10.1177/0047281618773704
Open Access: Closed
Topics: professional writing

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (6)

Redington (2017)

Methodology on Trial

Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Reeves (2015)

Of Frogs & Rhetoric: The Atrazine Wars

Technical Communication Quarterly
Sidler et al. (2008)

Genetics Interfaces: Representing Science and Enacting Public Discourse in Onli…

Technical Communication Quarterly
Spoel et al. (2008)

Public Communication of Climate Change Science: Engaging Citizens Through Apoca…

Technical Communication Quarterly
Propen et al. (2008)

Making Academic Work Advocacy Work

Journal of Business and Technical Communication

Show all 6 →

Myers (2007)

The Use of Pathos in Charity Letters: Some Notes toward a Theory and Analysis

Journal of Technical Writing and Communication

Also cites 19 works outside this index ↓

10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190225834.001.0001

↗
10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-102811-173825

↗
10.4324/9781315538747

↗
10.1177/1754073914545792

↗
10.1007/s12103-010-9096-9

↗
Kastely, J. L. (2004). Pathos: rhetoric and emotion. In W. Jost and W. Olmsted (Eds.), A Companion to Rhetori…

↗
10.7208/chicago/9780226432199.001.0001

↗
10.1002/bsl.770

↗
10.1007/s10979-006-9029-9

↗
10.2307/1289301

↗
10.1177/1079063208317540

↗
Nourse V. (2008)

10.1525/nclr.2008.11.1.33

New Criminal Law Review ↗
10.4324/9781315229164

↗
10.1097/00004583-200303000-00006

↗
10.1109/TPC.2010.2052856

↗
10.1177/0306624X08323454

↗
10.1177/1743872109349104

↗
10.1177/009885880703300209

↗
10.1080/00335639009383932

↗

CrossRef global citation count: 1 View in citation network →