Abstract

In this article, I analyze 73 circuit court opinions in which due process rights are weighed according to a little-known legal test called shocks the conscience. I also offer my observations of a federal trial in the U.S. district court in 2015 upon which the test was imposed. I reveal how requiring the shocks-the-conscience test confirms the authority of the state and silences those who have been singled out as individuals or as groups to be deprived of constitutional rights. In particular, professional communication scholars who examine emotional appeals as rhetorical strategies should find this article of interest.

Journal
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published
2019-07-01
DOI
10.1177/0047281618773704
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (78) · 7 in this index

  1. Minnesota Law Review
  2. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190225834.001.0001
  3. Aristotle. (2015). Rhetoric (W. Rhys Roberts, Trans.). Retrieved …
  4. Associated Press. (2017, March 2). State experts evaluating Minnesota’s commitment program for sex offenders …
  5. Lane. California Law Review
Show all 78 →
  1. The passions of the law
  2. Washburn Law Journal
  3. 10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-102811-173825
  4. Rhetoric and incommensurability
  5. 10.4324/9781315538747
  6. Methodologies for the rhetoric of health and medicine
  7. McGeorge Law Review
  8. Law & Psychological Review
  9. CBS News. (2014, September 7). Few options for female sex offender in Minnesota …
  10. University of Hawaii Law Review
  11. The politics of jurisprudence: A critical introduction to legal philosophy
  12. Crowe v. County of San Diego, Nos. 05-55467, 05-56364, 05-55542, 05-56311 (9th Cir. January 27, 2010).
  13. County of Sacramento v. Lewis, 523 U.S. 833. (May 26, 1998).
  14. Defendants’ Closing Arguments. (2015, April 10). Karsjens et al. v. Jesson et al., Civil File 0-11-CV-03659-D…
  15. International Journal of Social Inquiry
  16. Domingo v. Kowalski, No. 14-3957 (6th Cir. January 7, 2016).
  17. Foucha v. Louisiana, 504 U.S. 71 (1992).
  18. Frank, D. W. (2015, June 15). Findings of fact, conclusions of law, and order, Karsjens et al. v. Jenson et a…
  19. Freeman, N., Miner, M., McCulloch, D. & Wilson. R. (2014, November 17). Rule 706 expert report and recommenda…
  20. Dickinson Law Review
  21. Burdens of proof in modern discourse
  22. Minnesota Law Review
  23. 10.1177/1754073914545792
  24. Gustafson, D. E. (2017, June). Petition for writ of certiorari . …
  25. Failure to protect: America’s sexual predator laws and the rise of the preventive state
  26. 10.1007/s12103-010-9096-9
  27. Johnson v. Holmes, No. 04-2286 (10th Cir. July 26, 2006).
  28. Kansas v. Hendricks, 521 U.S. 346 (1997).
  29. Karsjens v. Jesson, No. 11-3659 (DWF/JJK) (D. Min, 2015).
  30. Karsjens v. Piper, No. 15-3485 (8th Cir., 2017).
  31. Kastely, J. L. (2004). Pathos: rhetoric and emotion. In W. Jost and W. Olmsted (Eds.), …
  32. Washburn Law Journal
  33. 10.7208/chicago/9780226432199.001.0001
  34. Lewis. Creighton Law Review
  35. 10.1002/bsl.770
  36. Seton Hall Circuit Review
  37. Chapman Law Review
  38. Lillard v. Shelby County Board Of Education, No. 94-5694 (6th Cir. February 21, 1996).
  39. Lombardi v. Whitman, No. 06-1077-cv (2nd Cir. April 19, 2007).
  40. 10.1007/s10979-006-9029-9
  41. 10.2307/1289301
  42. 10.1177/1079063208317540
  43. Minnesota Commitment and Treatment Act: Sexually Dangerous Persons and Sexual Psychopathic Personalities. Min…
  44. Morrison, B. (2015, November 3). Sexual psychopath—abused and abuser—appeals. Pioneer P…
  45. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  46. 10.1525/nclr.2008.11.1.33
    New Criminal Law Review  
  47. Poetic justice: The literary imagination and public life
  48. Hiding from humanity: Disgust, shame, and the law
  49. Rhetoric and incommensurability
  50. Fordham Law Review
  51. Plaintiffs’ Closing Arguments. (2015, March 27). Karsjens et al. v. Jesson et al., Civil File 0-11-cv-03659-D…
  52. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  53. 10.4324/9781315229164
  54. 10.1097/00004583-200303000-00006
  55. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  56. Technical Communication Quarterly
  57. Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review
  58. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  59. Rivas v. City of Passaic, No. 02-3875, 02-3916 (3rd Cir. April 26, 2004).
  60. Rochin v. California, 342 U.S. 165 (1952).
  61. Rosario, R. (2014, June 12). St. Peter regional treatment center under scrutiny. Daily …
  62. Rule 52 Hearing Transcript. (2015, February 27). Karsjens et al. v. Jesson et al., Civil File 0-11-CV-03659-D…
  63. Sarat, A. & Kearns, T. R. (2000). The cultural lives of law. In A. Sarat and T. R. Kearns (Eds.), …
  64. 10.1177/0306624X08323454
  65. 10.1177/1743872109349104
  66. Victim advocacy in the courtroom: Persuasive practices in domestic violence and child pro…
  67. Technical Communication Quarterly
  68. Technical Communication Quarterly
  69. 10.1177/009885880703300209
  70. Van Orden v. Schaefer, No. 09-cv-00971-AGF (E.D. Mo. 2017).
  71. 10.1080/00335639009383932
  72. Appeal to pity: Argumentum ad misericordiam
  73. The Urban Lawyer