Abstract

Through interviews and courtroom observations in a case study done in collaboration with a community partner in two judicial districts in Minnesota, the authors extend the scholarly conversation about critical, activist research in business and technical communication and make pedagogical suggestions by studying two groups who contribute to the discourse about victim rights: judges who accept plea negotiations and make sentencing decisions and advocates who help victims contribute, through victim impact statements, their reactions as crime victims and their requests for certain punishments and conditions for the crime perpetrators. The authors identify the technologies of power used by each group to assert their disciplinary authority and trace how these assertions play out in the courtroom. They conclude that by capitalizing on the normative structures of impact statements, advocates may actually give victims more power. Such activist research might benefit research participants and enhance research methods.

Journal
Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Published
2008-07-01
DOI
10.1177/1050651908315980
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
OA PDF Green
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (6)

  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  4. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  5. Technical Communication Quarterly
Show all 6 →
  1. Written Communication

References (34) · 3 in this index

  1. 10.1177/0011128703252408
  2. 10.2307/1600234
  3. Fordham Urban Law Journal
  4. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  5. Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296 (2004).
Show all 34 →
  1. Cornell Law Review
  2. The practice of everyday life
  3. Victim impact statements
  4. Criminal Law Review
  5. 10.1177/0011128799045004008
  6. 10.1111/j.1745-9125.1990.tb01334.x
  7. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  8. Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison
  9. The history of sexuality: An introduction
  10. Technical Communication Quarterly
  11. 10.1080/10683169908401776
  12. 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01697.x
  13. 10.1177/026975809400300206
  14. May). Victim rights legislation: An assessment of its impact on criminal justice practiti…
  15. A study of the victim impact statement and its relationship to sentence length in Prince …
  16. St. John's Journal of Legal Comment
  17. The utilization of victim impact statements and victim impact policy and instrument desig…
  18. 10.7208/chicago/9780226219783.001.0001
  19. Minnesota sentencing guidelines and commentary
  20. 10.1300/J076v29n03_05
  21. Cornell Law Review
  22. Payne v. Tennessee, 501 U.S. 808, 811 (1991).
  23. Right to Submit Statement at Sentencing
  24. Criminal Law Review
  25. Criminal Justice Journal
  26. 10.1080/07491409.2006.10757626
  27. Victim impact statement models: Improving communications between the justice system and o…
  28. March). Victim appearances at sentencing hearings under the California victims' bill of rights
  29. Waddell, C. (1996). Saving the Great Lakes: Public participation in environmental policy. In C. G. Herndl & S…