Improving Scientific Voice in the Science Communication Center at UT Knoxville

Russel Hirst University of Tennessee at Knoxville

Abstract

Many science students believe that scientific writing is most impressive (and most professionally acceptable) when impersonal, dense, complex, and packed with jargon. In particular, they have the idea that legitimate scientific writing must suppress the subjectivity of the human voice. But science students can mature into excellent writers whose voices are clear, interesting, unburdensome, efficient, and accurate. To do this, they must abandon their ponderous scientific voices and use techniques that produce good style. When I teach for the Science Communication Center at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville, I focus on helping students improve their scientific voice. I use workshop-style instruction, review of student writing, tutorial staff, and free online tutorials that I have developed. This article meditates upon the nature of good scientific voice as it analyzes examples of student writing to show improvements made through specific stylistic techniques.

Journal
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published
2013-10-01
DOI
10.2190/tw.43.4.e
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication

References (6) · 2 in this index

  1. 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2007.15674.x
  2. A Short Guide to Business Writing
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  4. Education in Scientific and Technical Communication: Academic Programs That Work
  5. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Show all 6 →
  1. Technical Communication