Scientific Jargon, Good and Bad

Journal of Technical Writing and Communication Jul 2003

Russel Hirst University of Tennessee at Knoxville

Abstract

Scientific and technical jargon—specialized vocabulary, usually Latinate—plays a vital role in scientific and technical communication. But its proper use continues to be a point of discussion because of our concern with audience adaptation, rhetorical exigence, rhetorical purpose, and ethics. We've focused on teaching students—and on convincing scientists, engineers, and other writers/speakers—to gear their specialized language to the recipients of their communication, to the occasion calling for their communication, to what they wish to accomplish through their communication, and to the ethical goals of safety, helpfulness, empowerment, and truth. These are exactly the sorts of things we should be doing. My contribution to this conversation is a reinforce ment and, I hope, an extension of the argument that we should also be teaching and convincing students and professionals: 1) to fully appreciate what makes jargon either good or bad; 2) to carefully distinguish jargon usage from other aspects of scientific and technical style; and 3) to recognize that in every context, even in communication among experts, jargon should be used judiciously—that is, in the most helpful, least taxing way.

Journal: Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published: 2003-07-01
DOI: 10.2190/j8jj-4yd0-4r00-g5n0
Open Access: Closed
Topics: technical communication voice and style

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (3)

Hirst (2016)

Bonding With the Nuclear Industry

Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Hirst (2013)

Improving Scientific Voice in the Science Communication Center at UT Knoxville

Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Hirst (2004)

Herbert Spencer's Philosophy of Style: Conserving Mental Energy

Journal of Technical Writing and Communication

Cites in this index (3)

Wilkinson (1992)

Jargon and the Passive Voice: Prescriptions and Proscriptions for Scientific Writing

Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Rowan (1989)

Moving beyond the <i>What</i> to the <i>Why</i>: Differences in Professional an…

Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Whitburn et al. (1978)

The Plain Style in Scientific and Technical Writing

Journal of Technical Writing and Communication

Also cites 8 works outside this index ↓

10.1109/TPC.1975.6593953

↗
10.1109/TPC.1980.6501852

↗
10.1109/TPC.1980.6501908

↗
10.2307/3546641

↗
Kaiser J. (1996)

10.1126/science.273.5280.1327

Science ↗
10.4006/1.3025464

↗
10.1007/s00254-002-0530-2

↗
10.2307/457093

↗

CrossRef global citation count: 35 View in citation network →