Abstract

Writing is common skill for many whose job requires them to communicate through business documents. But there are many professionals who seemingly have difficulty with writing. Many engineers are required to write proposals and reports yet have received little formal writing instruction. The purpose of this study was to determine if writing apprehension, their composition process, or the presence of deadlines affects the production of documents. The hypothesis was that engineers have high writing apprehension, generally use a product-based approach, and tight deadlines negatively affect the end quality. The researcher conducted in-depth interviews with civil engineers to gauge their level of apprehension, learn their personal composition process and determine how deadlines affect their writing. While the hypothesis was not conclusively supported, the study revealed six key themes into how engineers structure their writing tasks and found that the writing environment of engineers significantly impacts the composition process.

Journal
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published
2011-01-01
DOI
10.2190/tw.41.1.c
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication

Cites in this index (4)

  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  4. Written Communication
Also cites 15 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1177/107769907705400317
  2. 10.1177/002194368802500102
  3. 10.1080/01463379609370011
  4. 10.1177/002194368702400103
  5. 10.1177/002194368702400105
  6. 10.1080/02796015.1993.12085675
  7. 10.2307/376338
  8. 10.2307/356987
  9. 10.1177/002194368702400115
  10. 10.1177/002194367901700102
  11. 10.2307/376921
  12. 10.1177/0893318989002003003
  13. 10.1177/0893318990003004006
  14. 10.1177/002194366900600207
  15. 10.1023/A:1010690908200
CrossRef global citation count: 8 View in citation network →