Assessing the Readability of Government Accounting Standards: The Cloze Procedure

Raymond J. Shaffer; Kevin T. Stevens; William P. Stevens

doi:10.2190/4fm2-8gbw-kh0y-n25t

Journal of Technical Writing and Communication Jul 1993

Assessing the Readability of Government Accounting Standards: The Cloze Procedure

Raymond J. Shaffer Youngstown State University ; Kevin T. Stevens ; William P. Stevens DePaul University

Abstract

Studies assessing the readability of business writing typically use either readability formulas or, less often, the cloze procedure. This study argues that the cloze procedure, rather than a formula, is the appropriate method of assessing the readability of business writing and uses the cloze procedure to determine the readability of a statement issued by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB). The GASB provides authoritative statements on the accounting required for local and state governments and agencies. The results indicate that one important GASB statement is unreadable by college-level readers. If this and other GASB statements are unreadable by the users of GASB pronouncements, the GASB may not be fulfilling its role of communicating governmental accounting principles.

Journal: Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published: 1993-07-01
DOI: 10.2190/4fm2-8gbw-kh0y-n25t
CompPile: Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access: Closed
Topics: professional writing
Export: BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

Nilsson (1997)

Understandability of Narratives in Annual Reports

Journal of Technical Writing and Communication

References (21) · 4 in this index

Stevens K., Stevens K., and Stevens W., Measuring the Readability of Business Writing: The Cloze Procedure ve…
Zakaluk B. (1988)

Readability: Its Past, Present, and Future
Dorrell et al. (1991)

An Analysis of the Readability and Style of Letters to Stockholders

Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Schroeder N. (1987)

CPA Journal
Davison A. (1984)

Readability: The Situation Today

Show all 21 →

Klare G. R. (1988)

Readability: Its Past, Present, and Future
McConnell G. R. (1982)

Journal of Reading
Giles (1990)

The Readability Controversy: A Technical Writing Review

Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Bruce et al. (1981)

Why readability formulas fail

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
10.2307/747021

↗
Blyler (1991)

Reading Theory and Persuasive Business Communications: Guidelines for Writers

Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
10.1177/107769905603300106

↗
Peterson J., Peters N., and Paradis E., Validation of the Cloze Procedure as a Measure of Readability with Hi…
Bormuth J. R. (1975)

Help for the Reading Teacher
10.1111/j.1745-3984.1974.tb00976.x

↗
10.1177/002194369002700205

↗
Governmental Accounting Standards Board (1990)

Measurement Focus and Basis of Accounting-Governmental Fund Operating Statements
Singer H. (1980)

Reading and Learning from Text
Stevens Kevin T. (1992)

The Journal of Business
Stevens William P. and Stevens Kevin T., Can Your Recruits Communicate? Internal Auditor, forthcoming.
Stevens Kevin T., Stevens Kathleen C., and Stevens William P., A Response to Measuring Readability: A Compari…

CrossRef global citation count: 9 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Assessing the Readability of Government Accounting Standards: The Cloze Procedure

Abstract

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

References (21) · 4 in this index

Related Articles