Journal of Technical Writing and Communication Jul 1993

Assessing the Readability of Government Accounting Standards: The Cloze Procedure

Raymond J. Shaffer Youngstown State University ; Kevin T. Stevens ; William P. Stevens DePaul University

Abstract

Studies assessing the readability of business writing typically use either readability formulas or, less often, the cloze procedure. This study argues that the cloze procedure, rather than a formula, is the appropriate method of assessing the readability of business writing and uses the cloze procedure to determine the readability of a statement issued by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB). The GASB provides authoritative statements on the accounting required for local and state governments and agencies. The results indicate that one important GASB statement is unreadable by college-level readers. If this and other GASB statements are unreadable by the users of GASB pronouncements, the GASB may not be fulfilling its role of communicating governmental accounting principles.

Journal
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published
1993-07-01
DOI
10.2190/4fm2-8gbw-kh0y-n25t
Open Access
Closed
Topics
professional writing

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Nilsson (1997)
    Understandability of Narratives in Annual Reports
    Journal of Technical Writing and Communication

Cites in this index (3)

  1. Blyler (1991)
    Reading Theory and Persuasive Business Communications: Guidelines for Writers
    Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Dorrell et al. (1991)
    An Analysis of the Readability and Style of Letters to Stockholders
    Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  3. Giles (1990)
    The Readability Controversy: A Technical Writing Review
    Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Also cites 5 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1109/TPC.1981.6447826
     ↗
  2. 10.2307/747021
     ↗
  3. 10.1177/107769905603300106
     ↗
  4. 10.1111/j.1745-3984.1974.tb00976.x
     ↗
  5. 10.1177/002194369002700205
     ↗
CrossRef global citation count: 9 View in citation network →

Related Articles

  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication Apr 2026
    Stance in CEO Statements from U.S. and Vietnamese Banks’ Annual Reports: A Corpus-Based Cross-Cultural Study ↗
    Minh Hieu Nguyen
    multimodality professional writing
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication Mar 2026
    “It's Hard to Show ROI When You’re Preventing Things from Happening”: How Impact Storytelling Frames Community Health Initiatives for Executive Audiences ↗
    Margaret Hsiao
    qualitative research multimodality technical communication professional writing multilingual writers
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication Jan 2026
    Toward a Justice-Oriented Professionalism: Lessons Learned From a Critical Service-Learning Project in a Professional Writing Course ↗
    Renea C. Frey; Jeffrey M. Gerding; Ethan Nichols; Danielle Stone
    service learning multimodality professional writing
  4. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication Jan 2026
    Expanding Human-in-the-Loop: Critical Sensemaking for Technical and Professional Communication With Generative AI ↗
    Gustav Verhulsdonck; Jialei Jiang
    artificial intelligence professional writing multilingual writers
  5. Technical Communication Quarterly Jan 2026
    Evolving Information Design: Insights from Senior Experts in Technical and Professional Communication ↗
    Jason Tham
    multimodality technical communication professional writing