Shared Meaning and Public Relations Writing

Nancy Roundy Blyler Iowa State University

Abstract

Public relations writing has been neglected as a research topic in professional communication. This article uses rhetorical theory from a number of fields to examine a topic of recent concern—shared, or negotiated, meaning—in relation to two very different samples of public relations writing: the public relations texts produced by political-advocacy organizations involved in the midwestern farm crisis of the 1980s and an entry from an organizational newsletter. More specifically, the article studies the role of four rhetorical elements—exophoric and intertextual references, metaphors, and narratives—in generating a shared meaning. In doing so, the article develops the thesis that narratives were particularly important to this public relations writing because they provided a comprehensive, compelling framework for belief and thus contributed greatly to the shared meaning created by writers and readers.

Journal
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published
1992-07-01
DOI
10.2190/xt47-79ub-uk8a-02kj
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly

Cites in this index (4)

  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  3. Rhetoric Review
  4. Written Communication
Also cites 14 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1177/108056998604900307
  2. 10.2307/375964
  3. 10.2307/376723
  4. 10.2307/377963
  5. 10.2307/357716
  6. 10.4324/9781315835839
  7. 10.1111/j.1741-5446.1975.tb00666.x
  8. 10.1515/9783110838626.1
  9. 10.1086/448086
  10. 10.1080/03637758409390180
  11. 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1985.tb02979.x
  12. 10.1080/00335637209383138
  13. 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1985.tb02977.x
  14. 10.2307/2392249
CrossRef global citation count: 2 View in citation network →