Abstract

Although engineering departments were dissatisfied with early twentieth-century technical writing teaching methods, those methods were not simply a result of “anti-science” attitudes. In fact, late nineteenth- and early twentieth-century composition teachers tried to accommodate the influx of applied science students by teaching correctness and clarity of style and stressing the expository modes of writing. Emphasis on “clarity” was a legacy of rhetoricians like Hugh Blair of the eighteenth century. Emphasis on expository modes was a legacy of the nineteenth-century rhetoricians' interest in the inductive methodology of “pure” science, a method which implied invention by “observation” and made conclusions “self-evident”: argument was unnecessary since observations and methods only need to be explained to “convince.” Applied science departments were, in reality, dissatisfied with teaching methods based on “pure” rather than “applied” science methodology.

Journal
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published
1987-01-01
DOI
10.2190/g13y-6h22-1rb0-9051
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (6)

  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  3. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  4. Written Communication
  5. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Show all 6 →
  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication

Cites in this index (1)

  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Also cites 1 work outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1080/10417945509371385
CrossRef global citation count: 6 View in citation network →