Doing without the Generic He/Man in Technical Communication

Barbara Christian Peninsula College

Abstract

Recent psycholinguistic research has challenged the view that English speakers interpret the male pronouns and the generic man as words that refer to both males and females. The suggested ambiguity of these terms is of concern to technical communicators because it can affect the accuracy of their messages. Since guidelines for avoiding sex ambiguity in language are not generally available in technical writing or speech manuals, this article offers simple devices for eliminating the generic use of male pronouns and man. It also provides alternate terms for common sex-biased expressions.

Journal
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published
1986-01-01
DOI
10.2190/q9u1-7j44-lf6h-0plm
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication

References (7)

  1. Women and Language in Literature and Society
  2. Guidelines to Ensure Sex Fairness in Education Division Communications and Products, Sex Fairness in Educatio…
  3. The Handbook of Nonsexist Writing for Writers, Editors and Speakers
  4. Without BIAS: A Guidebook for Nondiscriminatory Communication
  5. Alaskan Sex Equity in Education News
Show all 7 →
  1. Language and the Sexes
  2. Without BIAS: A Guidebook for Nondiscriminatory Communication