The Case against Computerized Analysis of Student Writings

Lawrence J. Oliver Mitchell Institute

Abstract

Proponents of computerized text-analysis (CTA) systems like Bell Laboratories' Writer's Workbench contend that the computer's analysis of a text's surface features can help students become better writers and editors. Several colleges and universities have already integrated the new technology into their writing programs, and others will consider doing so in the future. Teachers of technical writing, however, ought to investigate carefully the capabilities and limitations of CTA before applying it to the technical writing classroom. Not even the most sophisticated of today's computers can detect the basic grammar and punctuation errors that bedevil student writers. Moreover, the computer's evaluation of a text's readability and style is untrustworthy and lacks a sound theoretical and pedagogical foundation; indeed, the machine's quantitative-based analysis of writing style might do some students more harm than good. Finally, there is no empirical evidence that CTA helps students become better writers.

Journal
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published
1985-10-01
DOI
10.2190/345x-fp6d-58j1-l91m
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication

References (31) · 3 in this index

  1. 10.2307/811145
  2. 10.1109/TCOM.1982.1095380
  3. Cherry L. L., Fox M. L., Frase L. T., Gingrich P. S., Keenan S. A., and MacDonald N. H., Computer Aids for Te…
  4. Western Electric
  5. Proceedings of the Future of Literacy Conference
Show all 31 →
  1. 10.2307/376828
  2. 10.2307/376698
  3. 10.2307/357400
  4. 10.1147/sj.213.0305
  5. Computers in the English Classroom
  6. Pipeline
  7. The Seybold Report on Publishing Systems
  8. What Computers Can't Do: The Limits of Artificial Intelligence
  9. Issues of Integrating Computers into Writing Instruction
  10. Understanding Reading: A Psycholinguistic Analysis of Reading and Learning to Read
  11. New Essays in Technical and Scientific Communication: Research, Theory, and Practice
  12. Bruce B., Rubin A., and Starr K., Why Readability Formulas Fail, Reading Education Report No. 28, 1981 (ERIC …
  13. Is Anybody Listening?
  14. Classical Rhetoric for the Modern Student
  15. New Essays in Technical and Scientific Communication
  16. Errors and Expectations: A Guide for the Teacher of Basic Writing
  17. College English
  18. 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1983.tb03521.x
  19. Research in the Teaching of English
  20. College Composition and Communication
  21. 10.2307/358119
  22. Pitfalls in Electronic Writing Land, English Education, 16, May 1984.
  23. Revising as “Debugging,” Notes on Teaching English, 11, May 1984.
  24. Kinesthetic Imagery and Helplessness in Three Poe Tales, Studies in Short Fiction, 20, Spring-Summer 1983.
  25. Helping Students Overcome Writer's Block, Journal of Reading, 26, November 1982.
  26. Melville, Leggett, and the Nightmare of Falling, Studies in the Humanities, 8, March 1981.