Abstract

Little empirical research has been conducted concerning the relationship of photographs to text in photoillustration. Knowledge of photoillustration has remained the informal folklore of layout artists and photographers for several reasons: the unquantifiable nature of aesthetic judgment; the differences between principles of photography and of traditional art forms; and advances in both camera and press technology. As a result of these factors, tradition, not empirical research, has dominated practice. But traditional layout principles which have been the subject of empirical testing have received both denial and reinforcement in such areas as the effectiveness of photoillustration, color versus black-and-white, placement of photographs, and the photograph and traditional layout principles. More research is needed into this vital aspect of text production; fruitful research directions are suggested and the synthesis of the knowledge of both the practitioner and the researcher advocated.

Journal
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published
1983-07-01
DOI
10.2190/2xet-tv2d-a4t8-1nwg
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 14 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.4159/harvard.9780674734470
  2. 10.1080/00223980.1968.10544944
  3. 10.1007/BF02766780
    Educational Communication and Technology  
  4. 10.1002/sce.3730570210
  5. 10.1007/BF02765190
    Educational Communication and Technology  
  6. 10.1007/BF02768497
    A V Communication Review  
  7. 10.1177/105960117800300303
  8. 10.1007/BF02768385
    AV Communication Review  
  9. 10.1007/BF02791375
    Educational Communication and Technology  
  10. 10.1177/001872086100300207
  11. 10.1177/001872087301500104
  12. 10.1007/BF02791377
    Educational Communication and Technology  
  13. 10.1080/1355800750120209
  14. 10.1007/BF02765453
    Educational Communication and Technology  
CrossRef global citation count: 1 View in citation network →