Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Apr 1981
A Brief Note on How Writing Errors are Judged
Donald Ross
University of Minnesota
Abstract
A brief business letter was written, then ten versions were madeup—each having from four to twenty-nine errors systematically introduced. Three hundred students read one version of the letter, then answered questions about the letter's contents and judged the “author” (is he intelligent, a good writer, etc.). The results pointed to misspelling as the most often noticed class of errors. Readers judged the author most harshly when spelling errors were present, but did not reach the same conclusion in the face of errors of syntax or punctuation. Finally, people labeled all classes of errors “misspelling,” and did not identify syntactic problems.
- Journal
- Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
- Published
- 1981-04-01
- DOI
- 10.2190/wh23-17fg-wd21-eet9
- CompPile
- Search in CompPile ↗
- Open Access
- Closed
- Topics
- Export
- BibTeX RIS
Citation Context
Cited by in this index (0)
No articles in this index cite this work.
References (0)
No references on file for this article.
Related Articles
-
Assessing Writing Apr 2026Frederike Strahl; Jörg Kilian; Jens Möller
-
Assessing Writing Apr 2026How do L2 writing subskills interact hierarchically? Insights from diagnostic classification models ↗Farshad Effatpanah; Hamdollah Ravand; Mahmoud Abdi Tabari; Yi-Hsin Chen; Olga Kunina-Habenicht
-
Assessing Writing Apr 2026Pursuing fair writing assessment: Halo effects in primary school foreign language writing in grade six ↗Ruth Trüb; Julian Lohmann; Jens Möller; Stefan D. Keller
-
Res Rhetorica Jan 2026Review/Recenzja: Nancy Organ. 2024. Data Visualization for People of All Ages. Oxon: CRC Press; and Jen Christiansen. 2023. Building Science Graphics: An Illustrated Guide to Communicating Science Through Diagrams and Visualizations. Oxon: CRC Press ↗Ewa Modrzejewska
-
Business and Professional Communication Quarterly Jan 2026Andres Guillermo Covilla-Martinez