Against Substituting Technical Writing for Freshman English

Merrill D. Whitburn Texas A&M University

Abstract

W. Earl Britton's proposal to substitute technical writing for freshman English is not convincing. The proposal rests on questionable beliefs about the two courses. Freshman English is not neglecting to emphasize the development of communications skills, and technical writing cannot be broadened enough to replace freshman English without becoming a course in freshman English. Both courses have important roles to play in the university. Freshman English should continue to concern itself with general communications skills, and technical writing should continue to involve the application of these skills to special kinds of communication.

Journal
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published
1975-01-01
DOI
10.2190/p97r-v02b-yaja-x6qu
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication

References (1)

  1. Numbers within parentheses refer to the pages of Britton's article from which quotations are taken.