Abstract

ABSTRACT Phaedrus performs an analogy between eros and writing that splits each term in two. The first orientation operates via a logic of ownership: lover of the beloved; writer/reader of text. The second orientation treats eros and writing as inventive activities that catalyze the self-overcoming of the lover and beloved—of the writer/reader and text. This orientation is heralded in Socrates’s palinode, but it has been overlooked by accounts of Socrates’s critique of writing. This article establishes the relationship between the beloved-as-reminder, established in the palinode, and writing-as-reminder, established in the discussion of writing. Thinking about eros and writing in an analogous relationship has significant implications for scholarly literature on Plato’s orientations to writing and knowledge. Specifically, this analogous relationship changes the way the most basic function of writing is configured within the dialogue. It also, importantly, informs the “possessive” and “inventive” approach the text takes toward its performance of pedagogy.

Journal
Philosophy & Rhetoric
Published
2022-12-30
DOI
10.5325/philrhet.55.4.0386
Open Access
Closed

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (7)

  1. Philosophy & Rhetoric
  2. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  3. Philosophy & Rhetoric
  4. Philosophy & Rhetoric
  5. Rhetoric Review
Show all 7 →
  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  2. Rhetoric Review
Also cites 2 works outside this index ↓
  1. “Respecting the Rupture: Not Solving the Problem of Unity in Plato’s Phaedrus.”
    Philosophy & Rhetoric  
  2. “Unmastering Speech: Irony in Plato’s Phaedrus.”
    Philosophy & Rhetoric  
CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network →