Their Hegemony—and Theirs

Dana L. Cloud Film Independent

Abstract

ABSTRACT This essay explores the concept of hegemony as it is differently elaborated by Perry Anderson and Peter Thomas. I first provide an orientation to Gramsci's theory of hegemony and how it has been taken up in cultural and rhetorical studies. Then I explore Anderson's interventions into hegemony theory in the earlier Antinomies of Antonio Gramsci before a substantial review of The H-Word. I then discuss Peter Thomas's critique of Anderson's orientation to the hegemonic constructs of the ruling classes of nation-states and conclude with a discussion about how the concept of hegemony elaborated by these authors might productively extend the work we do as scholars of rhetoric.

Journal
Philosophy & Rhetoric
Published
2021-06-15
DOI
10.5325/philrhet.54.2.0171
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (13)

  1. The Antinomies of Antonio Gramsci.
    New Left Review
  2. Considerations on Western Marxism
  3. The Antinomies of Antonio Gramsci
  4. The H-Word: The Peripeteia of Hegemony
  5. To ‘Feel’ and to ‘Understand’ Political Struggle: The National-Popular Rhetoric of Podemos.
    Journal of Communication Inquiry  
Show all 13 →
  1. Hegemony or Concordance? The Rhetoric of Tokenism in Oprah's Rag-to-Riches Biography.
    Critical Studies in Mass Communication  
  2. The Matrix and Critical Theory's Desertion of the Real.
    Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies  
  3. Reality Bites: Rhetoric and the Circulation of Truth Claims in US Political Culture
  4. Hegemony in a Mass-Mediated Society: Concordance about Reproductive Technologies.
    Critical Studies in Mass Communication  
  5. Gramsci's Relevance for the Study of Race and Ethnicity.
    Journal of Communication Inquiry
  6. Mapping Subaltern Studies and the Postcolonial
  7. The Gramscian Moment
  8. Toward a Gramscian Critical Rhetoric.
    Western Journal of Communication