Feminist Critique and the Realistic Spirit

Linda M. G. Zerilli University of Chicago

Abstract

ABSTRACTContemporary debates over the future of critique, feminist or otherwise, tend to neglect if not perpetuate a reliance on the philosophical tradition, with its disdain for the contingent and indifference to local audiences. If critique is to be realistic, as distinguished from realist or antirealist as the philosophical tradition has defined those terms, it must begin by clarifying the nature and extent of this reliance and begin to develop alternatives. Such an idea of critique would begin by questioning received notions of the relationship between theory and practice, which I argue are unduly inflected by philosophical prejudices. Theory should not be understood as a primarily epistemological or methodological enterprise whose task is to justify the basis of critique. Instead, theory should be conceived, with the rhetorical tradition, as a world-creating, first-order practice that gives meaning and significance to the human commons.

Journal
Philosophy & Rhetoric
Published
2017-11-15
DOI
10.5325/philrhet.50.4.0589
Open Access
Closed

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 25 works outside this index ↓
  1. Ahmed, Sara. 2000. “Whose Counting?” Feminist Theory 1(1): 97–103.
  2. Bauer, Nancy. 2015. How to Do Things with Pornography. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  3. Dreyfus, Hubert, and Charles Taylor. 2015. Retrieving Realism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  4. Ermath, Elizabeth. 2000. “What Counts as Feminist Theory?” Feminist Theory 1(1): 113–18.
  5. Fassin, Didier. 2017. “The Endurance of Critique.” Anthropological Theory 17(1): 4–29.
  6. Felski, Rita. 2015. The Limits of Critique. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  7. Goodman, Nelson. 1978. Ways of Worldmaking. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
  8. Gunnell, John G. 1998. The Orders of Discourse: Philosophy, Social Science, and Politics. Lanham, MD: Rowman …
  9. Harding, Sandra. 1997. “Comment on Hekman's ‘Truth and Method: Feminist Standpoint Theory Revisited’: Whose S…
  10. Hartsock, Nancy C. M. 1997. “Comment on Hekman's ‘Truth and Method: Feminist Standpoint Theory Revisited’: Tr…
  11. Hawthorn, Geoffrey. 1991. Plausible Worlds: Possibility and Understanding in History and the Social Sciences.…
  12. Hekman, Susan. 1997. “Truth and Method: Feminist Standpoint Theory Revisited.” Signs: Journal of Women in Cul…
  13. Hill Collins, Patricia. 1997. “Comment on Hekman's ‘Truth and Method: Feminist Standpoint Theory Revisited’: …
  14. Kompridis, Nikolas. 2005. “Disclosing Possibility: The Past and Future of Critical Theory.” International Jou…
  15. Kompridis, Nikolas. 2006. Critique and Disclosure: Critical Theory Between Past and Future. Cambridge, MA: MI…
  16. Latour, Bruno. 2004. “Why Has Critique Run out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern.” Critica…
  17. Methven, S. J. 2015. Frank Ramsey and the Realistic Spirit. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
  18. Moi, Toril. 2017. Revolution of the Ordinary: Literary Studies After Wittgenstein, Austin, and Cavell. Chicag…
  19. Putnam, Hilary. 1992. Renewing Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  20. Rodowick, D. N. 2015. Philosophy's Artful Conversation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  21. Struever, Nancy S. 2009b. Rhetoric, Modality, Modernity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  22. Winter, Bronwyn. 2000. “Who Counts (or Doesn't Count) What as Feminist Theory? An Exercise in Dictionary Use.…
  23. Zerilli, Linda M. G. 2005. Feminism and the Abyss of Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  24. Zerilli, Linda M. G. 2015. “The Turn to Affect and the Problem of Judgment.” New Literary History 46 (2): 261–86.
  25. Zerilli, Linda M. G. 2016a. A Democratic Theory of Judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
CrossRef global citation count: 1 View in citation network →