The Perennial Pleasures of the Hoax

James Fredal The Ohio State University

Abstract

ABSTRACTThough popular in the nineteenth century and widespread since, the elements of the hoax form can be traced to the origins of rhetorical theorizing, principally in the strategies of probability and counterprobability developed by the early orators and sophists. This article begins by defining features of the hoax as a textual event and then describes how hoaxes use traditional rhetorical techniques of both probability and improbability to transport viewers from credulity and acceptance to doubt and disbelief, demonstrating technical mastery over rhetorical conventions of the genre to mock their targets and to entertain and instruct their audience.

Journal
Philosophy & Rhetoric
Published
2014-02-01
DOI
10.5325/philrhet.47.1.0073
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (2)

  1. College English
  2. Written Communication
Also cites 21 works outside this index ↓
  1. Bird, Elizabeth S. 1996. “CJ's Revenge: Media, Folklore, and the Cultural Construction of AIDS.” Critical Stu…
  2. Carducci, Vince. 2006. “Culture Jamming: A Sociological Perspective.” Journal of Consumer Culture 6 (1): 116–38.
  3. Fleming, Chris, and John O'Carroll. 2010. “The Art of the Hoax.” Parallax 16 (4): 45–59.
  4. Gagarin, Michael. 2001. “Did the Sophists Aim to Persuade?” Rhetorica 19 (3): 275–91.
  5. Harold, Christine. 2004. “Pranking Rhetoric: ‘Culture Jamming’ as Media Activism.” Critical Studies in Media …
  6. Hoffman, David C. 2008. “Concerning Eikos: Social Expectations and Verisimilitude in Early Attic Rhetoric.” R…
  7. Kim, Leo. 2008. “Explaining the Hwang Scandal: National Scientific Culture and Its Global Relevance.” Science…
  8. Kraus, Manfred. 2010. “Perelman's Interpretation of Reverse Probability Arguments as a Dialectical Mise en Ab…
  9. Lambert-Beatty, Carrie. 2009. “Make Believe: Parafiction and Plausibility.” October 129: 51–84.
  10. Lateiner, Donald. 1990. “Deceptions and Delusions in Herodotus.” Classical Antiquity 9 (2): 230–46.
  11. Luck, George. 1985. Arcana Mundi: Magic and the Occult in the Greek and Roman Worlds. Baltimore, MD: John Hop…
  12. Mailloux, Steven. 1989. Rhetorical Power. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1989.
  13. Mayhew, George. 1964. “Swift's Bickerstaff Hoax as an April Fool's Joke.” Modern Philology 61 (4): 270–80.
  14. McAdams, Dan. 2005. The Redemptive Self. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.
  15. McLeod, Kembrew. 2011. “On Pranks.” Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies 8 (1): 97–102.
  16. Oring, Elliot. 2008. “Legendry and the Rhetoric of Truth.” Journal of American Folklore 121 (480): 127–66.
  17. Pettit, Michael. 2006. “The Joy of Believing: The Cardiff Giant, Commercial Deceptions, and Styles of Observa…
  18. Schmitz, Thomas A. 2000. “Plausibility in the Greek Orators.” American Journal of Philology 121 (1): 47–77.
  19. Sokal, Alan. 1996b. “Transgressing the Boundaries: Toward the Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity.…
  20. Vohs, Kathleen, Jason Chin, and Roy F. Baumeister. 2007. “Feeling Duped: Emotional, Motivational, and Cogniti…
  21. Wickman, Matthew. 2000. “The Allure of the Improbable: Fingal, Evidence, and the Testimony of the Echoing Hea…
CrossRef global citation count: 6 View in citation network →