The Late Fourteenth-Century Renaissance of Anglo-Latin Rhetoric

Martin Camargo University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign

Abstract

AbstractMost of the medieval arts of poetry and prose were written before the middle of the thirteenth century, but their dissemination was not uniform in all parts of Europe. In England, the surviving copies of a work such as Geoffrey of Vinsauf's Poetria nova taper off notably toward the end of the thirteenth century, and the numbers do not begin to pick up again until the last quarter of the fourteenth century. This pattern is no accident of preservation but reflects a significant revival of interest in Latin rhetoric and literature, centered at Oxford in the late fourteenth century. The characteristic literary materials and rhetorical methods of this renaissance resonated beyond the university environment and are reflected with striking precision in the references to rhetoric scattered throughout the vernacular poetry of Geoffrey Chaucer.

Journal
Philosophy & Rhetoric
Published
2012-06-01
DOI
10.5325/philrhet.45.2.0107
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 7 works outside this index ↓
  1. Camargo, Martin. 1988. “Toward a Comprehensive Art of Written Discourse: Geoffrey of Vinsauf and the Ars Dict…
  2. Camargo, Martin. 1999. “Tria sunt: The Long and the Short of Geoffrey of Vinsauf's Documentum de modo et arte…
  3. Camargo, Martin. 2009b. “Rhetoricians in Black: Benedictine Monks and Rhetorical Revival in Medieval Oxford.”…
  4. Camargo, Martin. 2010a. “Grammar School Rhetoric: The Compendia of John Longe and John Miller.” New Medieval …
  5. Clark, James G. 2004. A Monastic Renaissance at St Albans: Thomas Walsingham and his Circle c. 1350–1440. Oxf…
  6. Harbert, Bruce. 1975. A Thirteenth-Century Anthology of Rhetorical Poems. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Me…
  7. Richardson, H. G. 1941. “Business Training in Medieval Oxford.” American Historical Review 46 (2): 259–80.
CrossRef global citation count: 1 View in citation network →