Abstract

AbstractLincoln's First Inaugural Address was not designed to coax the seceded states back into the Union, because he never conceded that they had left. Rather, he sought to define the situation so that, if war broke out, the seceders would be cast as the aggressors and the federal government as acting in self-defense. To this end, he presented a principled case against the legitimacy or even possibility of secession while applying the arguments to the exigence at hand. He identifies the cause of the trouble as “unwarranted apprehension” among the southern states, announces his policy as a minimalist assertion of national sovereignty, and urges that disaffected southerners not act in haste to threaten that sovereignty further. Not only does he explicitly call for slowing down the push to war but the speech itself enacts a slowing of time. In sum, the First Inaugural illustrates both Lincoln's philosophical grounding and his rhetorical dexterity.

Journal
Philosophy & Rhetoric
Published
2012-06-01
DOI
10.5325/philrhet.45.2.0165
Open Access
OA PDF Bronze
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Rhetoric & Public Affairs

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 6 works outside this index ↓
  1. Fisher, Walter R. 1966. “The Failure of Compromise in 1860–1861: A Rhetorical View.” Communication Monographs…
  2. Foner, Eric. 2010. The Fiery Trial: Abraham Lincoln and American Slavery. New York: Norton.
  3. Gunderson, Robert G. 1961. “Lincoln and the Policy of Eloquent Silence: November, 1860, to March, 1861.” Quar…
  4. Holzer, Harold. 2008. Lincoln President-Elect: Abraham Lincoln and the Great Secession Winter, 1860–1861. New…
  5. Leff, Michael. 1988. “Dimensions of Temporality in Lincoln's Second Inaugural.” Communication Reports 1 (1): 26–31.
  6. Leff, Michael, and Andrew Sachs. 1990. “Words the Most Like Things: Iconicity and the Rhetorical Text.” Weste…
CrossRef global citation count: 1 View in citation network →