Abstract

AbstractThis essay analyzes General Orders No. 100, a U.S. Civil War document considered the fırst modern codifıcation of the rules of war. Recent scholarship praises the humanitarian nature of the legal code, especially as it concerns the emancipation of slaves. Without rejecting these features, I argue that the code marks a key shift in the legal framing of war. The author, Francis Lieber, uses new spatial and temporal boundaries to forge a sprawling and timeless fıeld of battle while amplifying the moral mandate of war to grant legitimacy to numerous acts of harsh violence. The only safeguard to Lieber’s broad mandate for military force is a vague notion of self-restraint that I label “humane nationalism.” Given the enormous influence of the Lieber Code, its rhetoric marks a powerful antecedent to how nations conduct warfare and legitimize what we now call “total war.”

Journal
Rhetoric & Public Affairs
Published
2020-03-01
DOI
10.14321/rhetpublaffa.23.1.0047
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (3)

  1. Rhetoric & Public Affairs
  2. Philosophy & Rhetoric
  3. Rhetoric & Public Affairs
Also cites 7 works outside this index ↓
  1. 8. Elihu Root, “Francis Lieber,” American Journal of International Law 7 (1913): 459.
  2. 19. The topic of warfare is ubiquitous in the history of Western rhetorical studies. Aristotle identifıes war…
  3. 22. Mark E. Neely, “Was the Civil War a Total War?” Civil War History 50 (2004): 434-58. For more on the deba…
  4. Michael Leff, "Dimensions of Temporality in Lincoln's Second Inaugural," Communication Reports 1 (1988): 26-31
  5. 29. D. H. Dilbeck, A More Civil War: How the Union Waged a Just War (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolin…
  6. 33. Dilbeck, “‘The Genesis of This Little Tablet with My Name’: Francis Lieber and the Wartime Origins of Gen…
  7. 87. See W. Michael Reisman and Chris Anthony, The Laws of War: A Comprehensive Collection of Primary Document…
CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network →