Abstract
This teaching tip build on scholarship around the disconnect between teacher expectations and student experiences of peer review (Ahmed, 2021). In particular, it frames writers' feedback preferences through Elbow and Belanoff's (2000) "kinds of responses," and encourages reviewers to hit the "sweet spot" of constructive and supportive feedback after reading DePeter (2020). This framing helps scaffold the "asks" of peer review for students in a situation that is often fraught, challenging, and/or confusing, providing teachers with an opportunity to effectively teach an important and relevant transferable skill.
- Journal
- Journal of Response to Writing
- Published
- 2023-04-15
- CompPile
- Open Access
- OA PDF Gold
- Topics
- Export
- BibTeX RIS
Citation Context
Citation data not yet available for this article.
Citation data is not available for Journal of Response to Writing. This journal's publisher does not deposit reference lists with CrossRef.
Related Articles
-
Computers and Composition Jun 2026“Article laundry” or “tutor in pocket?”: Multilingual writers’ generative AI-assisted writing in professional settings ↗Qianqian Zhang-Wu
-
Computers and Composition Jun 2026Evaluating students’ Coded animated stories as multimodal narrative composition in the middle school English curriculum ↗Len Unsworth
-
Business and Professional Communication Quarterly May 2026Joe Edward Hatfield
-
Business and Professional Communication Quarterly Apr 2026Suo Yan Mei; Suo Yan Ju; Zarima Mohd Zakaria
-
Business and Professional Communication Quarterly Apr 2026Diyako Rahmani; Jenilee Crutcher Williams; Michelle T. Violanti; Stephanie Kelly