Philosophy & Rhetoric Jan 2005

“Analyzing How Rhetoric Is Epistemic”: A Reply to Steve Fuller

William D. Harpine

Abstract

Research Article| January 01 2005 “Analyzing How Rhetoric Is Epistemic”: A Reply to Steve Fuller William D. Harpine William D. Harpine Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Philosophy & Rhetoric (2005) 38 (1): 82–88. https://doi.org/10.2307/40238202 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Twitter Permissions Search Site Citation William D. Harpine; “Analyzing How Rhetoric Is Epistemic”: A Reply to Steve Fuller. Philosophy & Rhetoric 1 January 2005; 38 (1): 82–88. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/40238202 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All Scholarly Publishing CollectivePenn State University PressPhilosophy & Rhetoric Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. Copyright © 2004 The Pennsylvania State University2004The Pennsylvania State University Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Journal
Philosophy & Rhetoric
Published
2005-01-01
DOI
10.2307/40238202
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
rhetorical criticism social media editorial matter
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (8)

  1. Davidson, Donald. 1984. Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. Oxford: Clarendon P.
  2. Fuller, Steve. 2002. Social Epistemology. 2nd ed. Bloomington: Indiana UP.
  3. ---. 2005. “Philosophy Taken Seriously but Without Self-Loathing: A Response to Harpine.” Philosophy and Rhet…
     ↗
  4. Fuller, Steve, and James H. Collier. 2004. Philosophy, Rhetoric, and the End of Knowledge: A New Beginning fo…
     ↗
  5. Harpine, William D. 1985. “Can Rhetoric and Dialectic Serve the Purposes of Logic?” Phi- losophy and Rhetoric…
Show all 8 →
  1. ---. 2004. “What Do You Mean, Rhetoric Is Epistemic?” Philosophy and Rhetoric 37.4:335-52.
     ↗
  2. Williamson, Timothy. 1994. Vagueness. London: Routledge.
  3. ---. 2000. Knowledge and Its Limits. Oxford: Oxford UP.
CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Related Articles

  1. Pedagogy Jan 2026
    Contributors ↗
    rhetorical criticism genre theory writing pedagogy graduate education two-year college teacher development social media race and writing gender and writing affect and writing literary studies editorial matter
  2. Philosophy & Rhetoric Apr 2025
    Introduction: On the Desirability of Speaking to Others ↗
    Nirvana Tanoukhi; Nicholas Dunn
    modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism discourse analysis argument social media race and writing gender and writing disability studies public rhetoric literary studies editorial matter
  3. Pedagogy Apr 2025
    Contributors ↗
    modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism african american rhetorics cultural rhetorics first-year composition writing pedagogy basic writing graduate education two-year college teacher development writing centers technical communication professional writing labor and working conditions digital rhetoric multimodality social media literacy studies race and writing gender and writing community literacy literary studies editorial matter
  4. Rhetoric & Public Affairs Mar 2025
    Political Mourning: Identity and Responsibility in the Wake of Tragedy ↗
    Kimberley Hannah-Prater
    rhetorical criticism archival research social media race and writing gender and writing affect and writing editorial matter
  5. Technical Communication Quarterly Oct 2024
    “I Feel Like I’m in a Box”: Contrasting Virtual Reality “Imaginaries” in the Context of Academic Innovation Labs ↗
    Brent Lucia; Matthew A. Vetter; David A. Solberg
    rhetorical criticism discourse analysis creative writing graduate education teacher development professional writing digital rhetoric social media grammar and mechanics editorial matter