Designing “The People”: Constitutive Fractures in Contemporary Collectives

Rhetoric & Public Affairs Mar 2023

Designing “The People”: Constitutive Fractures in Contemporary Collectives

Daniel J. DeVinney

Abstract

Abstract At the 2017 Women's March, Shepard Fairey's We The People posters generated a great deal of excitement for their patriotic depiction of a diverse “people.” But the posters’ success exists in tension with the broader critiques of the Women's March. This essay argues that our current understanding of constitutive rhetoric is ill-equipped to explain this tension. Using the ideas of Danielle Allen and feminist scholars Aimee Carrillo Rowe, Karma Chávez, and Alyssa A. Samek, I perform several readings of the posters to explicate the fractures within our theories of constitutive rhetoric. I demonstrate that our current understanding of “the people” through oneness is hampered by a unity/difference binary that limits our ability to understand heterogenous collectives. Instead, I argue that an approach of wholeness better captures the complex collective life of contemporary coalitions and better attunes scholars to the intricate ways “the people” come into being. I argue that shifting the key terms of constitutive rhetoric to solidarity, vision, and health can help critics develop a more nuanced understanding of diverse coalitions. Overall, this essay offers scholars an opportunity to rethink our theories of “the people” to better account for the emerging strategies, needs, and values of contemporary collectives.

Journal: Rhetoric & Public Affairs
Published: 2023-03-01
DOI: 10.14321/rhetpublaffa.26.1.0043
Open Access: Closed
Topics: multimodality multilingual writers

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

Dadugblor (2025)

That Peace May Unite All: Constitutive Rhetorics and the Rhetorical Constructio…

Rhetoric Society Quarterly

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

CrossRef global citation count: 2 View in citation network →