Abstract

This article critiques the whole-college reform project dubbed Guided Pathways. The article describes how Guided Pathways research has failed to provide data that support the reform project’s claims, disputes the extent to which Guided Pathways can claim to be equity-oriented work, and ultimately identifies Guided Pathways as a reform project that diverges from the interests of the two-year college.

Journal
Teaching English in the Two-Year College
Published
2023-12-01
DOI
10.58680/tetyc2023512107
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 7 works outside this index ↓
  1. Redesigning America’s Community Colleges: A Clearer Path to Student Success
  2. Brown v. Board of Education and the Interest-Convergence Dilemma
    Harvard Law Review  
  3. Valuing an Embodied Epistemology to Counter Neoliberal Programmatic Reform at the Two-Yea…
    Journal of Basic Writing  
  4. Interests and Opportunities: Race, Racism, and University Writing Instruction in the Post…
  5. The Shape of Educational Inequality
    Science Advances  
  6. Directed Self-Placement at ‘Democracy’s Open Door’: Writing Placement and Social Justice …
  7. A Critical Time for Reform: Empowering Interventions in a Precarious Landscape
    Teaching English in the Two-Year College  
CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network →