Teaching English in the Two-Year College Dec 1999

Relating Revision Skills to Teacher Commentary

Marilyn Ruth Sweeney

Abstract

Considers how the revising skills of basic writing students improve when they receive both inductive and deductive teacher feedback. Finds that students who received inductive feedback changed their largest percent of errors when given oral conferences and students who received deductive feedback changed their smallest number of errors when given oral feedback.

Journal
Teaching English in the Two-Year College
Published
1999-12-01
DOI
10.58680/tetyc19991876
Open Access
Closed
Topics
basic writing revision

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Silva (2012)
    Camtasia in the Classroom: Student Attitudes and Preferences for Video Commenta…
    Computers and Composition

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

CrossRef global citation count: 8 View in citation network →

Related Articles

  1. Teaching English in the Two-Year College May 2015
    Feature: Publishing in Developmental Writing ↗
    Karen L. Henderson
    basic writing multilingual writers revision
  2. Teaching English in the Two-Year College Dec 2002
    Asynchronous Electronic Peer Response in a Hybrid Basic Writing Classroom ↗
    Virginia Crank
    basic writing online writing instruction revision
  3. College Composition and Communication Feb 1996
    What's It worth and What's It For? Revisions to Basic Writing Revisited ↗
    Judith Rodby
    basic writing revision
  4. College Composition and Communication Feb 1996
    Interchanges: Rethinking Basic Writing ↗
    basic writing multilingual writers revision
  5. Computers and Composition Jan 1996
    Promises, promises: Computer-assisted revision and basic writers ↗
    Robert E. Crafton
    basic writing revision