Pedagogy Jan 2026

Mining Reading

Lisa M. Swan ; Tes Schaeffer

Abstract

Abstract Students in first-year composition are often asked to read multiple texts quickly and independently during the process of researching and writing research essays, yet reading is rarely an explicit pedagogical focus. Researchers in metacognition and readerly expertise agree that expert reading is purposeful, defined in part by agility in engaging with a text, its context and its embeddedness within larger conversations and with one's own intentions beyond or within such conversations. Drawing from these concepts of readerly purpose and source use, we propose a theory of mining reading — a way of reading for conversation. Mining reading is when readers mine a text to understand the text's message within a broader topic or disciplinary conversation and make a text mine by identifying its use for the reader's rhetorical purpose. We describe ways to scaffold mining reading from our writing classes and share findings from student reflections, gathered with IRB approval, about the affordances and constraints of this approach. We ultimately situate mining reading as one way to help students understand reading as an active meaning making process and develop a flexible sense of purpose and agency in their research essays.

Journal
Pedagogy
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
10.1215/15314200-12097306
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
rhetorical criticism first-year composition writing pedagogy
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (22) · 8 in this index

  1. Adler-Kassner (2007)
    Reading Practices in the Writing Classroom
    WPA: Writing Program Administration
  2. Bazerman (1980)
    A Relationship between Reading and Writing: The Conversational Model
    College English
  3. Bazerman (1988)
    Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science
  4. Bizup (2008)
    BEAM: A Rhetorical Vocabulary for Teaching Research-Based Writing
    Rhetoric Review
  5. Brent (2013)
    The Research Paper, and Why We Should Still Care
    WPA: Writing Program Administration
Show all 22 →
  1. Bunn (2011)
    How to Read Like a Writer
    Writing Spaces
  2. Carillo (2015)
    Securing a Place for Reading in Composition: The Importance of Teaching for Transfer
  3. CCCC (Conference on College Composition and Communication). 2022. “Position Statement on Citation Justice in …
  4. Connors (1999)
    The rhetoric of citation systems—Part II: Competing epistemic values in citation
    Rhetoric Review
  5. Haas et al. (1988)
    Rhetorical Reading Strategies and the Construction of Meaning
    College Composition and Communication
  6. HASWELL et al. (1999)
    Context and Rhetorical Reading Strategies: Haas and Flower (1988) Revisited
    Written Communication
  7. Horning (2011)
    Where to Put the Manicules: A Theory of Expert Reading
    Across the Disciplines
  8. Howard et al. (2010)
    Writing from Sources, Writing from Sentences
    Writing and Pedagogy
  9. Howard (2021)
    “The Ethics of Teaching Rhetorical Intertextuality.”
    Journal of Academic Ethics  ↗
  10. Leckie (1996)
    Desperately Seeking Citations: Uncovering Faculty Assumptions About the Undergraduate Res…
    Journal of Academic Librarianship  ↗
  11. Macmillan (2012)
    Strategies for Integrating Information Literacy and Academic Literacy: Helping Undergradu…
     ↗
  12. Robillard (2006)
    Young Scholars Affecting Composition: A Challenge to Disciplinary Citation Practices
    College English
  13. Saldaña (2013)
    The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers
  14. Salvatori (1996)
    Conversations with Texts: Reading in the Teaching of Composition
    College English
  15. Sullivan (2017)
    ‘Deep Reading’ as a Threshold Concept in Composition Studies
  16. Tinberg (2017)
    When Writers Encounter Reading in a Community College First-Year Composition Course
  17. Wineburg (2019)
    Lateral Reading and the Nature of Expertise: Reading Less and Learning More When Evaluati…
    Teachers College Record  ↗
CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Related Articles

  1. Journal of Writing Research Feb 2026
    Generative AI use in college writing classes: An analysis of student chat logs and writing projects ↗
    Sarah Madsen Hardy; Pary Fassihi; Shuang Geng; Christopher McVey; Matt Parfitt
    rhetorical criticism first-year composition writing pedagogy artificial intelligence multilingual writers
  2. Pedagogy Oct 2025
    Resilience ↗
    Emily Rónay Johnston
    rhetorical criticism first-year composition writing pedagogy curriculum design teacher development editorial matter
  3. Pedagogy Oct 2025
    Contributors ↗
    modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism genre theory cultural rhetorics first-year composition writing pedagogy advanced composition creative writing writing across the curriculum graduate education two-year college service learning teacher development technical communication professional writing labor and working conditions archival research multimodality artificial intelligence literacy studies race and writing gender and writing disability studies literary studies editorial matter
  4. Pedagogy Apr 2025
    ALL BLACK EVERYTHING ↗
    Chloe Leavings; Carly Braxton; Jessica Ridgeway
    rhetorical criticism genre theory first-year composition writing pedagogy teacher development multimodality race and writing gender and writing
  5. Pedagogy Apr 2025
    Contributors ↗
    modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism african american rhetorics cultural rhetorics first-year composition writing pedagogy basic writing graduate education two-year college teacher development writing centers technical communication professional writing labor and working conditions digital rhetoric multimodality social media literacy studies race and writing gender and writing community literacy literary studies editorial matter