Abstract

Abstract This article focuses on student perceptions of their experiences in an ungraded classroom that uses engagement-based grading contracts (EBGCs). The assessment ecology is described in detail, and then the author shares student reflections on their experiences with EBGCs, which were collected in the form of an end-of-semester memo assignment. Comprehensively, students find EBGC use to be a positive and worthwhile assessment experience. While there is a learning curve involved, students appreciate the real-life approach to both labor and engagement on writing tasks, the amount of agency and choice built into the contract, and the ecology's incorporation of extensive written feedback in lieu of scores or points. Another key takeaway is its positive impact on student affect — especially in instances of students self-disclosing diagnoses of anxiety. Student-reported challenges to EBGC use are also discussed, including their own wrestling with ideas about past experiences with traditional grading, personal levels of motivation, and accountability. Overall, an engagement-based grading contract approach appears to be a pleasurable and accessible assessment option for teachers looking to pursue an ungraded approach in their writing classrooms.

Journal
Pedagogy
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
10.1215/15314200-11246303
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (12) · 2 in this index

  1. College Composition and Communication
  2. The Hidden Inequities in Labor-Based Contract Grading
  3. Cowan Michelle . 2020. “A Legacy of Grading Contracts for Composition.” …
  4. Rhetorics of Overcoming: Rewriting Narratives of Disability and Accessibility in Writing …
  5. College Composition and Communication
Show all 12 →
  1. Antiracist Writing Assessment Ecologies: Teaching and Assessing Writing for a Socially Ju…
  2. Labor-Based Grading Contracts: Building Equity and Inclusion in the Compassionate Writing…
  3. Itchuaqiyaq Cana Uluak . 2022. “MMU Scholar List.” Cana Uluak Itchuaqiya…
  4. Kryger Kathleen , and ZimmermanGriffin X. 2020. “Neurodivergence and Int…
  5. Validating the Consequences of Social Justice Pedagogy
  6. Morris Sean Michael . 2021. “When We Talk about Grades, We Are Talking a…
  7. Stommel Jesse . 2021. “Grades Are Dehumanising [sic], but ‘Ungrading’ Is…