Abstract

Abstract This article explores the impact of labor-based grading contracts on student attitudes and perceptions within multilingual First-Year Composition (FYC) sections at an R1 university. Data collected qualitatively and quantitatively examined correlations between labor-based grading contracts and shifts in student attitudes toward writing and overall learning experiences. Findings revealed that some students found labor-based grading contracts motivating, leading to improved attitudes toward writing, while others found themselves demotivated or stressed by the absence of traditional grades. The concept of fairness emerged as a key concern, challenging the assumption that labor-based grading contracts universally benefit students. This article underscores the need for nuanced implementation of labor-based grading contracts and encourages a student-centered approach to foster equitable and antiracist writing assessment practices. It acknowledges the potential benefits of labor-based contract grading, but also its associated challenges, and calls for a critical examination of grading contracts within local contexts to ensure they genuinely advance opportunities for underrepresented students.

Journal
Pedagogy
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
10.1215/15314200-11246367
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (14) · 2 in this index

  1. A Phenomenology of Whiteness
    Feminist Theory  
  2. The Hidden Inequities in Labor-Based Contract Grading
  3. Craig Sherri . 2021. “Your Contract Grading Ain't It.” WPA: Writing Prog…
  4. College Composition and Communication
  5. Grading Contracts: Assessing Their Effectiveness on Different Racial Formations
Show all 14 →
  1. Inoue Asao B. 2015. Antiracist Writing Assessment Ecologies: …
  2. Friday Plenary Address: Racism in Writing Programs and the CWPA
    WPA: Writing Program Administration
  3. Inoue Asao B . 2019. Labor-Based Grading Contracts: Building Equity and …
  4. Second Language Acquisition and Second Language Learning
  5. Poe , Mya, InoueAsao B., and ElliotNorbert. 2018. Writing Assessment, Social Justice, …
  6. Royster Jacqueline Jones , and KirschGesa E. 2012. Feminist Rhetorical P…
  7. Schwarz Virginia M . 2020. (De)Norming Classroom Merit: Grading Contract…
  8. Spidell , Cathy, and ThelinWilliam H.2006. “Not Ready to Let Go: A Study of Resistance…
  9. Assessing Writing