Abstract

Abstract This article explores the impact of labor-based grading contracts on student attitudes and perceptions within multilingual First-Year Composition (FYC) sections at an R1 university. Data collected qualitatively and quantitatively examined correlations between labor-based grading contracts and shifts in student attitudes toward writing and overall learning experiences. Findings revealed that some students found labor-based grading contracts motivating, leading to improved attitudes toward writing, while others found themselves demotivated or stressed by the absence of traditional grades. The concept of fairness emerged as a key concern, challenging the assumption that labor-based grading contracts universally benefit students. This article underscores the need for nuanced implementation of labor-based grading contracts and encourages a student-centered approach to foster equitable and antiracist writing assessment practices. It acknowledges the potential benefits of labor-based contract grading, but also its associated challenges, and calls for a critical examination of grading contracts within local contexts to ensure they genuinely advance opportunities for underrepresented students.

Journal
Pedagogy
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
10.1215/15314200-11246367
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (1)

  1. College Composition and Communication
Also cites 5 works outside this index ↓
  1. A Phenomenology of Whiteness
    Feminist Theory  
  2. The Hidden Inequities in Labor-Based Contract Grading
  3. Inoue Asao B. 2015. Antiracist Writing Assessment Ecologies: …
  4. Inoue Asao B . 2019. Labor-Based Grading Contracts: Building Equity and …
  5. Wright Katherine Landau , HodgesTracy S., and McTigueErin M. 2019. “A Va…
CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network →