Abstract

AbstractThis essay argues that the emphasis on spoken contributions in English and other humanities courses can exclude disabled students. The COVID-19 pandemic's necessitation of online learning has forced instructors to offer students multiple entry points for conversation—not only through spoken dialogue but also text threads, anonymous polls, and communal annotation assignments. Instructors’ shifts in participation guidelines both before and at the height of the pandemic reveal faculty members’ adoption of a disability justice pedagogy that privileges flexibility. Drawing on these transformations, the author offers pragmatic suggestions for how to value course contributions beyond students’ capacity to voice their reflections aloud. The relinquishment of rigid academic expectations for participation makes space not just for students with disabilities but also for other minority populations, including women students, nonbinary students, first-generation students, and students of color who contribute their expertise in more capacious ways than the standard, discussion-based classroom allows. To conclude, the author considers how instructors might replicate accessible online tools—from Zoom chats to asynchronous platforms—in the return to face-to-face teaching. These new and primarily virtual forms of engagement reframe participation not as individual contributions to conversation, but as ongoing work intended for the purpose of community growth and collective care.

Journal
Pedagogy
Published
2023-01-01
DOI
10.1215/15314200-10081993
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (24)

  1. Disability
  2. Beery Zoë . 2020. “When the World Shut Down, They Saw It Open.” New York Times, August24. https://www.nytimes…
  3. Quiet: The Power of Introverts in a World that Can't Stop Talking
  4. Campanile Jessica . 2020. “Thanks to the Pandemic, the Needs of People with Disabilities Are Being Met, But W…
  5. The Influence of Personality on Social Participation in Learning Environments
    Leaning and Individual Differences  
Show all 24 →
  1. Custodio Jonathan . 2020. “Disabled Students Already Faced Learning Barriers. Then Coronavirus Forced an Abru…
  2. Academic Ableism: Disability and Higher Education
  3. Dolmage Jay . 2021. “Ableism, Access, and Inclusion.” Michigan State University. 4 February. Zoom Webinar. ht…
  4. Talking, Sketching, Moving: Multiple Literacies in the Teaching of Writing
  5. Disabilities and e-Learning Problems and Solutions: An Exploratory Study
    Educational Technology and Society
  6. Friedner Michele , MillsMara, and SanchezRebecca. 2020. “How to Teach with Text: Platforming Down as Disabili…
  7. Gabriel Trip . 2011. “Speaking Up in Class, Silently, Using Social Media.” New York Times, 12May. https://www…
  8. Herman Peter C. 2020. “Online Learning Is Not the Future.” Inside Higher Ed, June10. https://www.insidehigher…
  9. jackson remus , Stewart-TaylorF., and WielandCara. 2020. “Disability Justice and Mutual Aid Pedagogy; or, How…
  10. Feminist, Queer, Crip
  11. Kahn Sarah . 2020. “Professors Must Work to Support Students Struggling with Class Participation.” Emory Whee…
  12. The Academic Seminar as Emotional Community
    Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy
  13. Miller Rowana . 2020. “Long Live the Zoom Class Chat.” Slate, 8 October. https://slate.com/technology/2020/10…
  14. Mullaney Clare . 2021. “The Shift Online Has Finally Made Space for Disabled Students. Times Higher Education…
  15. Mad at School: On Rhetorics of Mental Disability and Academic Life
  16. Between Speaking and Silence: A Study on Quiet Students
  17. St. Amour Madeline . 2020. “The Moment Is Primed for Asynchronous Learning.” Inside Higher Ed, 16September. h…
  18. Sins Invalid. 2020. “What Is Disability Justice?” 16June. https://www.sinsinvalid.org/news1/2020/6/16/what-is…
  19. The Question of Access