Abstract

AbstractWriting assessment and social justice rely largely on success-trajectory narratives, which sideline productive failure as a means of resisting normative futurity-based modes of education and policy. This essay offers an alternative perspective on failure in writing assessment and social justice by illustrating how relying on rhetoric as a hope and means for positive change can undermine aims of social justice and a critical education. By examining the queer (non)possibilities for assessment and acceptance without dependence on constant improvement and success, instructors may find more inclusive ways of thinking about the value of rhetoric's role in a generative acceptance of difference.

Journal
Pedagogy
Published
2022-10-01
DOI
10.1215/15314200-9859286
Open Access
OA PDF Bronze
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (3)

  1. Research in the Teaching of English
  2. College English
  3. College Composition and Communication
Also cites 11 works outside this index ↓
  1. Reframing Writing Assessment to Improve Teaching and Learning.
  2. Sex, or the Unbearable
  3. What We Really Value: Beyond Rubrics in Teaching and Assessing Writing
  4. Large-Scale Assessment, Locally Developed Measures, and Automated Scoring of Essays: Fish…
    Assessing Writing  
  5. Writing and Accountability
  6. Antiracist Writing Assessment Ecologies: Teaching and Assessing Writing for a Socially Ju…
  7. Coming to Terms: A Theory of Writing Assessment
  8. Retention and Resistance: Writing Instruction and Students Who Leave
  9. Contingency, Iron, and Solidarity
  10. The Language of Exclusion: Writing Instruction at the University
    College English  
  11. Born Losers: A History of Failure in America
CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network →