Pedagogy Jan 2020

Thinking Critically, Thinking Again in Core Literature

Miriam Marty Clark

Abstract

Ideological transparency is an issue in core literature classes, particularly where teachers understand literature as social critique. This article argues that the critical and prosocial growth we hope students will achieve in a semester with us requires a longer and more incremental process, one in which literature courses have a limited but potentially meaningful role.

Journal
Pedagogy
Published
2020-01-01
DOI
10.1215/15314200-7879155
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (11) · 3 in this index

  1. Bass (1999)
    The Scholarship of Teaching: What’s the Problem?
    Inventio
  2. Brandenberger (2014)
    Prosocial Growth during College
    Journal of Moral Education  ↗
  3. Burke (1966)
    Terministic Screens
     ↗
  4. Chick (2017)
    Beginning Where the Students Are Beginning
    Pedagogy
  5. Hayot (2017)
    Then and Now
     ↗
Show all 11 →
  1. Kahneman (2011)
    Thinking Fast and Slow
  2. Kahneman Daniel . 2017. “Why We Contradict Ourselves and Confound Each Other.” On Being with Krista Tippett, …
  3. Kopelson (2003)
    Rhetoric on the Edge of Cunning; Or, The Performance of Neutrality (Re)considered As a Co…
    College Composition and Communication  ↗
  4. Kuh George D. 2008. High Impact Education Practices: What They Are, Who Has Access to Them, and Why They Matt…
  5. Ore (2017)
    Pushback
    Pedagogy
  6. Sponenberg (2012)
    Introduction
    Pedagogy
CrossRef global citation count: 3 View in citation network → Build reading path →