Abstract

The author reconsiders and revises her advocacy of the pedagogical performance of neutrality and argues that performing or otherwise rehabilitating notions of “objectivity” as we teach argument may be particularly useful and urgent in the Trump era.

Journal
Pedagogy
Published
2020-01-01
DOI
10.1215/15314200-7878953
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (17)

  1. Positioning Oneself: A Feminist Approach to Argument
    Emmel, Resch, and Tenney
  2. Rogerian Rhetoric: Ethical Growth through Alternative Forms of Argumentation
    Emmel, Resch, and Tenney
  3. Thesis and Antithesis: Rewriting the Rules on Writing
    Chronicle of Higher Education
  4. Coming Out in the Classroom: A Return to the Hard Place
    College English  
  5. Argument Revisited; Argument Redefined: Negotiating Meaning in the Composition Classroom
Show all 17 →
  1. Doing What Comes Naturally: Change, Rhetoric, and the Practice of Theory in Literary and …
  2. The Trouble with Principle
  3. The Reasoned Thesis: The E-Word and Argumentative Writing as a Process of Inquiry
    Emmel, Resch, and Tenney
  4. Queer Visibility in Commodity Culture
  5. Feminism and Composition: The Case for Conflict
  6. Kaplan Marty . 2017. “Trump, Twitter, and the So-Called Truth in an Age …
  7. Rhetoric on the Edge of Cunning; Or, The Performance of Neutrality (Re)Considered as a Co…
    College Composition and Communication  
  8. Of Ambiguity and Erasure: The Perils of Performative Pedagogy
  9. Moments of Argument: Agonistic Inquiry and Confrontational Cooperation
    College Composition and Communication  
  10. Textual Orientations: Lesbian and Gay Students and the Making of Discourse Communities
  11. Deconstructing Queer Theory or the Under-theorization of the Social and the Ethical
  12. Tollerton David . 2016. “In the Age of Trump, Why Bother Teaching Studen…