Pedagogy Jan 2016

Unpacking the Universal Library

Mike Edwards

Abstract

Recent arguments against today's digital reading practices rely on contradictory implicit claims: that digital technologies harm the way we read, and that reading is a set of monolithic and unchanging practices. Both claims are mistaken. Digital reading practices illuminate the diverse forms of value in the labor and capital associated with textual work.

Journal
Pedagogy
Published
2016-01-01
DOI
10.1215/15314200-3158701
Open Access
Closed

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Downs (2021)
    Critical Reading in a Screen Paradigm
    Pedagogy

Cites in this index (3)

  1. Salvatori et al. (2012)
    What Is College English? Stories about Reading: Appearance, Disappearance, Morp…
    College English
  2. Diaz (2012)
    The Digital Archive as a Tool for Close Reading in the Undergraduate Literature…
    Pedagogy
  3. Manarin (2012)
    Reading Value
    Pedagogy
Also cites 8 works outside this index ↓
  1. Bianco (2012)
    “This Digital Humanities Which Is Not One.”
     ↗
  2. Fyfe (2011)
    “How to Not Read a Victorian Novel.”
    Journal of Victorian Culture  ↗
  3. Hardt (2001)
    Empire
     ↗
  4. Mikics (2013)
    Slow Reading in a Hurried Age
     ↗
  5. Ramsay (2011)
    Reading Machines: Toward an Algorithmic Criticism
     ↗
  6. (1996)
    “Conversations with Texts: Reading in the Teaching of Composition.”
    College English  ↗
  7. Varoufakis (2012)
    Modern Political Economics: Making Sense of the Post-2008 World
     ↗
  8. Wisor (2009)
    “Versioning Virginia Woolf: Toward a Post-eclectic Edition of Three Guineas.”
    Modernism/Modernity  ↗
CrossRef global citation count: 2 View in citation network →