Abstract

In the wake of postcolonial studies, the culture wars, and the ongoing canon debate, the task of constructing one’s own pedagogical canon as a responsible educator continues to be an arduous one. Drawing in part on the work of Robert Coles on using literature for therapeutic purposes, as well as John Guillory’s notion that representation, in the political sense, is misapplied when it comes to canon formation, this article suggests that professors rethink how they put together their own syllabi. It asks that they consider shifting their primary criteria for inclusion from the much-disputed ideal of representativeness to one of relatability, defined in this instance as a student’s potential ethical engagement with a work. The central idea is that the student’s intuitive identification with some characters and texts should actually be encouraged, not dismissed, as a means of promoting greater engagement, more active learning, and a critical analysis of the text’s and their own personal values.

Journal
Pedagogy
Published
2013-10-01
DOI
10.1215/15314200-2266459
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Pedagogy

Cites in this index (6)

  1. Pedagogy
  2. Pedagogy
  3. Pedagogy
  4. Pedagogy
  5. Pedagogy
Show all 6 →
  1. College English
Also cites 7 works outside this index ↓
  1. Why Novels and Poems in Our Medical Schools?
    Literature and Medicine  
  2. Why Read Multicultural Literature? An Arnoldian Perspective
    College English  
  3. This Side of Paradise
  4. Cultural Capital: The Problem of Literary Canon Formation
  5. Taking Multiculturalism Personally
  6. The Program Era: Postwar Fiction and the Rise of Creative Writing
  7. Reading Minds: The Study of English in the Age of Cognitive Science
CrossRef global citation count: 1 View in citation network →