Unprincipled Pedagogy

Abstract

Postprocess theory questions the usefulness of pedagogical principles. This article proposes a casuistic pedagogy, which offers a stance rather than a method. Casuistry, the art of case-based reasoning, reframes pedagogy as a series of occasions rather than a system of thought, thus providing grounds for a postprocess pedagogy.

Journal
Pedagogy
Published
2011-04-01
DOI
10.1215/15314200-1218058
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Pedagogy

Cites in this index (3)

  1. Pedagogy
  2. College English
  3. College Composition and Communication
Also cites 9 works outside this index ↓
  1. Arras, John D. 1991. “Getting Down to Cases: The Revival of Casuistry in Bioethics.” Journal of Medicine and …
  2. Bok, Sissela. 1978. Lying Moral Choice in Public and Private Life. New York: Pantheon.
  3. Burke, Kenneth. 1966. Language as Symbolic Action. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  4. Fish, Stanley. 1989. “Anti-Foundationalism, Theory Hope, and the Teaching of Composition.” In Doing What Come…
  5. Hart, Roderick P., and Don M. Burks. 1972. “Rhetorical Sensitivity and Social Interaction.” Speech Monographs…
  6. Jonsen, Albert R. 1991. “Casuistry as Methodology in Clinical Ethics.” Theoretical Medicine12: 295 – 307.
  7. Jonsen, Albert R., and Stephen Toulmin, 1988. The Abuse of Casuistry. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  8. Miller, Richard E. 1998. “The Arts of Complicity.” College English61: 10 – 28.
  9. Taylor, Charles. 1989. “The Rushdie Controversy.” Public Culture2: 118 – 22.
CrossRef global citation count: 1 View in citation network →