Abstract

Edith Wharton's lack of recognition as a short story writer depends on several factors, including conflicting theories about short story form and technique, her relationship to literary and cultural history, and her use in literature classrooms. Her problematic relationship to the short story form provides an important case study in critical reception and canon formation.

Journal
Pedagogy
Published
2008-01-01
DOI
10.1215/15314200-2007-027
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 3 works outside this index ↓
  1. Beer, Janet. 1997. Kate Chopin, Edith Wharton, and Charlotte Perkins Gilman: Studies in Short Fiction. New Yo…
  2. Nevius, Blake. 1953. Edith Wharton: A Study of Her Fiction. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  3. Singal, Daniel Joseph. 1987. “Towards a Definition of American Modernism.” American Quarterly39, no. 1: 7-26.
CrossRef global citation count: 3 View in citation network →