Rhetorical Ethnography and the Virtue of Vulnerability in Transdisciplinary Research Methods
Abstract
This paper considers some of the ways ethnography has been adopted in transdisciplinary rhetoric and also considers theoretical questions internal to rhetorical ethnography that can help transdisciplinary scholars navigate limitations and potential liabilities inherent in transdisciplinary work. I seek to more carefully consider transdisciplinary features of rhetoric though ethnographic study which, in its position as studying cultures both familiar and foreign to the researcher, mirror many of the disciplinary relations expressed in Marilyn Stember’s topology of disciplinarity. Noting that transdisciplinary rhetoricians engage with scholarship by experts in other fields, an ethnographic approach to transdisciplinary rhetoric recognizes that disciplinary experts might have expert knowledge that they struggle to communicate to non-experts, and rhetoricians should tread carefully in offering solutions to these communicative difficulties. I suggest rhetorical vulnerability and self-awareness expressed through standpoint as two strategies scholars of transdisciplinary rhetoric can use to adopt stances of transparent subjectivity rather than feigning scientific objectivity.
- Journal
- Poroi
- Published
- 2022-05-10
- DOI
- 10.17077/2151-2957.31090
- Open Access
- OA PDF Diamond
- Topics
Citation Context
Cited by in this index (0)
No articles in this index cite this work.
Cites in this index (0)
No references match articles in this index.
Related Articles
-
Composition Forum Oct 2025
-
Research in the Teaching of English Aug 2024An Eight-Year Longitudinal Study of an English Language Arts Teacher’s Developmental Path through Multiple Contexts ↗Peter Smagorinsky; Stacia L. Long
-
Written Communication Jan 2018Jayne C. Lammers; Valerie L. Marsh
-
Written Communication Jan 2012A Case Study of Swedish Scholars’ Experiences With and Perceptions of the Use of English in Academic Publishing ↗Anna Olsson; Vera Sheridan
-
Research in the Teaching of English Aug 2011Subjectivity, Intentionality, and Manufactured Moves: Teachers’ Perceptions of Voice in the Evaluation of Secondary Students’ Writing ↗Jill V. Jeffery