Abstract

Code-switching pedagogies do not consider that some features of African American Verbal Tradition (AVT) are rhetorically effective mainstream communication structures in academic writing. My research asserts that when teaching language/dialect difference in majority white school settings, contrastive analysis techniques such as these may have highly negative effects on AAL (African American Language) speakers. Thus, as an alternative to code-switching pedagogical practices, I introduce a comparative approach that may be applied across all minority language groups and that highlights African and African American contributions to standardized American written communication structures and demonstrates the value of AVT in academic settings. This comparative rhetorical approach may have a positive impact on student language attitudes toward AAL by illustrating that many academic writers from varied racial/ethnic backgrounds often use AVT in their writing for rhetorical purposes and to produce lively, image-filled, concrete, readable essays.

Journal
College Composition and Communication
Published
2017-12-01
DOI
10.58680/ccc201729418
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  2. College Composition and Communication

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

CrossRef global citation count: 10 View in citation network →